Epidemiologic Reviews Advance Access originally published online on June 8, 2006
Epidemiologic Reviews 2006 28(1):3-26; doi:10.1093/epirev/mxj003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ARTICLES |
Immunization to Protect the US Armed Forces: Heritage, Current Practice, and Prospects
1 Office of the Surgeon General, US Army, Falls Church, VA
2 US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, MD
3 Allergy-Immunology Department, Vaccine Healthcare Centers Network, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC
Reprint requests to COL John D. Grabenstein, Military Vaccine Agency, Office of the Army Surgeon General, 5113 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041 (e-mail: john.grabenstein{at}us.army.mil).
accepted for publication March 28, 2006.
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
TOP
ABSTRACT
SMALLPOXAmericans serving with the US Armed Forces need protection from the dangerous infections that they can contract during training, based on occupation, during overseas deployment, or because of underlying health status. For over 230 years, the military health-care system has immunized troops to protect them personally and to help them accomplish their missions. Military researchers have invented, developed, and improved vaccines and immunization delivery methods against more than 20 diseases. This article consolidates content from several previous historical reviews, adds additional sources, and cites primary literature regarding military contributions and accomplishments. Discussion emphasizes smallpox, typhoid fever, tetanus, influenza, meningococcal disease, adenovirus, yellow fever, pneumococcal disease, and anthrax. Delivery issues include documentation, simultaneous immunization, seroscreening, safety surveillance, jet injection, and cold-chain management. Immunization policies for each major US conflict are described. Military immunization programs need to be individualized on the basis of personal contraindications and prior immunity. The proper conduct of military immunization programs respects the need for detailed education of military personnel, maximizes quality in immunization delivery, and supports quality clinical care to prevent and treat adverse events after immunization. Military immunization programs maintain the health of soldiers, marines, sailors, airmen, and coast guardsmen, the resources most critical to military success.
biological warfare • endemic diseases • history • immunization • immunoglobulins • mass screening • military personnel • vaccines
AFEB, Armed Forces Epidemiological BoardIGIM, immune globulin for intramuscular administrationWRAIR, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Immunization protects the personal health of US military personnel and maintains their ability to accomplish missions. The immunization program of the US Department of Defense is broad ranging, protecting the forces from a variety of pathogenic threats. Over 12 percent of the US adult population has participated in the military immunization program, including over 2.6 million current members of the active and reserve components of the Department of Defense and 24.8 million living US veterans of military service (1).
This article updates and expounds on previous reviews of the US military immunization program (2–8). Military immunization requirements often exceed those for civilian adults, because of the travel and other occupational hazards confronted by soldiers, marines, sailors, airmen, and coast guardsmen. The requirements and recommendations are described in a joint immunization regulation (9), summarized in table 1.
|
Immunizations have both direct benefit to the recipient and indirect benefit to the people in the community in which the vaccinee resides or works (i.e., "herd immunity"). In military settings, the indirect benefit takes on an additional dimension, insofar as an immunized service member is less likely to succumb to a disease that threatens his or her team's mission. By staying healthy, the immunized service member helps other team members to accomplish their mission and return home safely. Because of both direct and indirect benefits, most US military immunizations are required, rather than voluntary. Figures 1, 2, and 3 illustrate the records used to document immunizations of troops during World War II. Figure 4 shows a contemporary electronic immunization record.
|
|
|
|
Senior preventive-medicine officers from the five Armed Services develop vaccine recommendations for military trainees and other military personnel, with decisions made by the Army, Navy, and Air Force Surgeons General and the Coast Guard Director of Health and Safety. During policy development, advice may be sought from the Armed Forces Epidemiological Board (AFEB), an expert advisory board of civilian physicians and scientists (10, 11). Before the US Food and Drug Administration took its present dominant role in vaccine regulation in the mid-1970s, the AFEB's cutting-edge expertise was pivotal in deciding immunization dosing schedules and vaccine composition.
Modern immunization policy development takes into account the public-health recommendations published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in consultation with its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.
A synopsis of the vaccines commonly administered at various historical points to US military personnel appears in table 2 (2–19). The US military contributions to vaccine development are summarized in table 3.
|
|
|
SMALLPOX |
|---|
The first immunization program implemented for the US military was variolation (i.e., variola inoculation) of trainees entering the Continental Army in 1777 (4, 12, 14, 17, 20–24). Impetus for this program began in the fall of 1775, as British forces expelled smallpox cases and recently variolated people from Boston and sent them across the siege lines maintained by the fledgling Continental Army. In the winter of 1775–1776, up to half of the Continental Army task force advancing on Québec, Canada, was ill with smallpox. The Americans suffered 5,500 smallpox casualties among their force of 10,000 colonial troops. Decimated, the US forces lost the Battle of Québec and were obliged to retreat in May 1776.
In response to the military defeat outside Québec, the Director General of the Army Hospital recommended to George Washington that the Continental Army be variolated (12, 17, 21, 24). Variolation was an archaic and dangerous method of preventing smallpox with a mortality risk as high as 2 percent, but the best method then available.
At Morristown, New Jersey, in January 1777, Washington finally ordered a mandatory inoculation program for his troops if they had not survived smallpox infection earlier in life, because the lethal risk from infection (
16 percent) was judged far greater than that from variolation (1 in 300) (12, 17, 21, 24).
Variolation was later replaced by vaccination with cowpox virus. For the War of 1812, the US War Department ordered that vaccination be substituted for variolation to prevent smallpox (12, 17). In 1848, the US Navy did the same.
During the American Civil War, use of smallpox vaccine expanded on both sides of the conflict, including in training camps. Nonetheless, an estimated 19,000 cases of smallpox occurred among the troops, with approximately 7,000 deaths (5, 13, 17, 25, 26).
In the Spanish-American War of 1898, volunteer troops were vaccinated against smallpox as they mustered into service. More smallpox cases occurred among these new volunteers than among the Regular Army. Most of the 825 smallpox admissions (258 fatal) occurred in the Philippine Islands during that conflict (5, 13, 17, 20, 26).
Military training camps continued to administer smallpox vaccine during World War I (27). Despite the large mobilization, there were only 853 smallpox admissions (780 within the United States) and 14 deaths. In 1919, an American citizen named Charles Higgins sent an angry and lengthy manuscript to President Woodrow Wilson, pleading that he stop smallpox vaccination for Armed Forces, listing both true and erroneous risks of smallpox vaccination (28), but vaccination continued through the decades (20).
The US military conducted major smallpox vaccination programs during World War II (16, 17, 27). Among US troops, there were 115 smallpox cases (105 overseas). Cases were attributed to three main causes: failure to vaccinate properly, an inadequate cold chain to keep the vaccine potent, and failure to read and interpret vaccination reactions properly. Perhaps the last Americans to contract smallpox were five soldiers, one of whom died, during the 1953 smallpox outbreak amid the Korean War.
By the early 1970s, with smallpox not circulating within the United States, routine smallpox vaccination of civilians (especially children) was no longer practiced, because complications like eczema vaccinatum and encephalitis were not considered justified risks in the face of no disease threat (20). US service members were routinely vaccinated against smallpox until 1984 (2, 29).
In 1984, routine military smallpox vaccinations were limited to new troops entering basic training (10). In March 1990, the Department of Defense "temporarily discontinued" smallpox vaccination of basic trainees (30).
This "temporary" policy seemed to be a permanent state of affairs, until the anthrax attacks along the eastern seaboard in the fall of 2001 heightened concerns about bioterrorism generally. President Bush announced a national smallpox vaccination program on December 13, 2002 (29). In this plan, smallpox vaccinations resumed for medical and epidemic response teams and for troops deployed to high-threat areas. The current program is described below.
|
PROPHYLAXIS OF DISEASES RELATED TO POOR HYGIENE OR SANITATION |
|---|
During actual conflict, sanitation is often compromised, and wound and blood-borne infections become a greater hazard to military forces.
The science of vaccinology advanced slowly in the 1800s, so smallpox vaccine was the only vaccine available for nearly the whole century. A few troops may have received postexposure prophylaxis against rabies using Pasteur's 1885 vaccine (31).
Preventive medicine gained new prominence as a contributor to the war effort during World War I, but the lack of antibiotics or specific vaccines forced a reliance on passive immunization via antitoxins. Diphtheria antitoxin was an important form of therapy (5). Antitoxins to treat gas gangrene provided some therapeutic value (5, 8, 16). Antibiotics largely replaced these products by the end of World War II.
Typhoid fever
In the Spanish-American War, volunteer soldiers, their officers, and physicians marched to the trainee camps, where some began to get sick and die as a result of contamination of the water supply. Overseas, America experienced 280 battle fatalities. However, at the five main US training camps, before getting anywhere near a battlefield, there were 20,738 cases of typhoid fever, 1,590 of them fatal. In the Army overall, there were an estimated 2,620 typhoid fever deaths (2–4, 17, 26, 32–36).
Almroth Wright developed a heat- and phenol-treated typhoid vaccine in Britain (37, 38). The British Army used early forms of typhoid vaccine during the Anglo-Boer War in southern Africa in 1899. Among 14,626 immunized British soldiers, there were 1,417 cases of typhoid fever and 163 deaths (11 of 1,000 soldiers). In contrast, among 313,618 unimmunized soldiers, there were 48,754 cases and 6,991 deaths (32 of 1,000) (39).
Major Frederick Russell of the US Army Medical School adapted British and German production methods to produce the inactivated, whole-cell, typhoid vaccine supply used by the entire United States. Voluntary immunization of some American soldiers against typhoid fever began in 1909 (5, 13, 14, 17, 40–42). In 1911, Army Chief of Staff Major General Leonard Wood ordered mandatory typhoid immunization for a 15,000-man division, using Russell's vaccine. Wood also required that immunizations be recorded in medical records. Only two cases of typhoid fever occurred. A few months later, immunization became mandatory for all soldiers. The Navy adopted typhoid immunization as well.
With a vaccine to shield troops from typhoid bacteria during the unsanitary conditions of World War I, a mere approximately 2,000 cases of typhoid fever, with 227 deaths, were reported among 4.1 million Americans in uniform (5, 13, 14, 16, 33, 43, 44).
Various vaccine combinations of typhoid, paratyphoid A, and paratyphoid B antigens were used during the 20th century (5, 13, 43, 44); the trivalent vaccine was commonly known as "TAB vaccine," triple vaccine, or enteric vaccine. Typhoid fever affected 0.42 cases per thousand soldiers in World War I but only 0.05 cases per thousand in World War II, because of expanded immunization.
Various typhoid vaccines were developed at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR), notably the acetone-killed and dried and the heat-phenol treated formulations (4, 8, 45). Development of the typhoid Vi polysaccharide-injectable vaccine and live attenuated typhoid vaccine capsules rendered obsolete the whole-cell typhoid vaccines, renowned for high degrees of injection-site pain and swelling, fever, and systemic reactions (8, 46).
Tetanus
Wound tetanus was a major cause of morbidity and mortality until World War I. Passive immunization with tetanus antitoxin was relatively effective. However, it had a harsh side-effect profile, notably serum sickness, due to its equine protein content. In 1933, tetanus toxoid was licensed in the United States, but this vaccine was adopted slowly for the civilian populace (5, 8, 13, 14, 44, 47).
In May 1940, the Army Surgeon General requested that tetanus toxoid be given to all active-duty troops (4, 5, 15, 16, 48, 49). Routine tetanus immunization was approved by the War Department in June 1941. A record of the tetanus toxoid doses administered was stamped on soldiers' identification tags (e.g., "T42 44") and also recorded in paper records (15). The example in figure 3 reflects tetanus immunizations given in 1942 and 1944. Booster toxoid doses were routinely given before entering an overseas theater and after a wound. The incidence of local reactions after immunization increased when booster doses were administered at short intervals. The US Navy tended to use alum-precipitated toxoid, which induced more persistent antibody concentrations, compared with the fluid toxoid used by the US Army at that time (50).
Only 12 cases of tetanus were reported throughout World War II, from all theaters of operations, despite more than 12 million Americans in uniform who incurred more than 2.7 million hospital admissions for wounds or injuries (4, 5, 48). All 12 cases were in unimmunized or incompletely immunized troops.
Until recently, tetanus-diphtheria toxoids were administered to all trainees upon entry into military service. This left military cohorts vulnerable to intermittent pertussis outbreaks (51, 52). Now, the recently licensed tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccines are being adopted (8), with the added benefit of preventing prolonged cough illness among service members. This approach provides indirect benefit to service members' children. Adult-strength tetanus-diphtheria toxoids or tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis booster immunizations are given at intervals consistent with recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. People who may not have received a basic immunizing series earlier in life receive a basic immunizing series.
Hepatitis A
During the second year of the Civil War, an estimated 5 percent of Union troops were jaundiced. During World War II, 180,000 troops developed infectious hepatitis (i.e., hepatitis A), principally in North Africa, Italy, the South Pacific, and postwar Germany. Within the Pusan perimeter during the Korean War, 4,000 American troops were hospitalized with hepatitis (5, 15, 18, 53, 54).
Edwin Cohn, John Oncley, and colleagues at Harvard University isolated the gamma-globulin fraction of serum in 1944, under contract to the US Navy. Their methods yielded immune globulin for intramuscular administration (IGIM, "gamma globulin"). Joseph Stokes, Jr., and John Neefe reported the utility of IGIM in reducing the incidence of hepatitis A in 1945. Clinicians used this drug primarily to prevent or mitigate measles, mumps, hepatitis A, and hepatitis B (2–4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 47, 53–58). IGIM prevented posttransfusion hepatitis in battle casualties, if given promptly (59). IGIM was routinely given in the 1960s to troops assigned to Korea or Vietnam (10, 58, 60–63).
In 1985, Leonard Binn and colleagues tested a formalin-inactivated hepatitis A vaccine at WRAIR. In 1991, Lieutenant Colonel Bruce Innis and a team of WRAIR scientists began an efficacy trial in Thai schoolchildren that found a protective efficacy effect of 94 percent (8, 54, 64, 65).
Hepatitis A prophylaxis was transformed in 1995 with the US licensing of inactivated hepatitis A vaccines, rendering obsolete serial painful injections of IGIM into the buttocks. With hepatitis A infection the most common vaccine-preventable infection among international travelers (8, 11, 66, 67), the 1995 universal immunization policy for US military personnel was a logical step.
Hepatitis B
In 1942, infectious hepatitis and serum hepatitis were first clearly differentiated. This came about when some lots of yellow-fever vaccine were unknowingly manufactured with tainted serum albumin, added as a protein stabilizer (10, 53, 54, 68–70).
No immunologic means of preventing hepatitis B were available until the Food and Drug Administration licensed the first hepatitis B vaccine in 1981. IGIM was found to provide temporary prophylaxis against both hepatitis A and hepatitis B infections in troops assigned to Korea (54, 58, 62).
Today, hepatitis B immunization policy for US military personnel focuses on several cohorts at occupational risk (e.g., medical and mortuary affairs). Personnel assigned to the Korea peninsula since 1986 have been immunized, as have accessions since 2001 (10, 54, 71). Increasingly, basic trainees immunized as children or adolescents are joining the military, which favors preimmunization seroscreening, discussed below. Because of the vaccine's relatively high cost, hepatitis B vaccine initially was administered intradermally, but this route of administration fell out of favor nationally, because of inconsistent injection technique and antibody response (8, 72, 73).
Cholera
The first injectable cholera vaccines date back to the 1890s. The bacterial strains used in the United States were selected at the Army Medical School during World War II (4). From the 1940s to the 1980s, injectable whole-cell cholera vaccine was given to alert units. However, the vaccine fell into disfavor as cholera immunization ceased being a condition for passage of international borders, as well as the vaccine's tendency to evoke substantial injection-site and systemic reactions, modest efficacy, and short duration of protection.
The AFEB recommended cessation of routine cholera immunization in 1973 (10). Emphasis on sanitation is now considered more important in a healthy adult military population than reliance on a vaccine with limited efficacy. At present, the oral cholera vaccines developed under US Army contract by the University of Maryland and licensed in Europe and Canada are unlicensed in the United States (8, 34, 74, 75).
|
PROPHYLAXIS OF CONTAGION AND EPIDEMICS |
|---|
Until 1990, loss of life due to nontraumatic causes had decimated more armies than bullets had in American military campaigns (17, 76). During basic training, military accessions come from disparate locations with varying degrees of innate or naturally acquired immunity, are placed in relatively confined living quarters, and subjected to a high degree of physical stress (77). As with college freshmen in dormitories, respiratory pathogens, in particular, can spread easily in this setting.
Influenza
During 1918–1919, a worldwide outbreak of viral influenza killed over 50 million people (4, 5, 7, 13, 14, 17, 44, 78–82). More than 500,000 deaths occurred in the United States. The worldwide pandemic killed more Americans than the military death tolls of all of America's wars in the 20th century combined. Scientists tried a vaccine against Pfeiffer's bacillus (Bacillus influenzae, now called Haemophilus influenzae) in the belief that the epidemic had a bacterial cause. This vaccine was manufactured at the Army Medical School and elsewhere (82–85).
US Army statistics for the pandemic showed that 791,907 soldiers were admitted to hospitals in the United States or France for influenza, and 24,664 of them died (86). Overall, one in 67 American soldiers died of influenza or pneumonia in 1918 (5, 13, 44, 80, 81).
Remembering how the outbreak quickly sapped the fighting strength of American troops, the US Army Surgeon General commissioned research to develop influenza vaccines in the 1940s, the first iterations of the vaccines we still use today (2–5, 8, 10, 13, 14, 87, 88). Double-blinded field trials began among US service members, demonstrating as much as 80 percent efficacy. In 1943, the first influenza vaccine against types A and B infection was used widely. In the fall of 1945 and the spring of 1946, all 7 million troops were immunized against influenza. The efficacy of all such vaccines was dependent on correlation of the vaccine's antigens with circulating viral types, but scientists did not yet fully appreciate the unceasing antigenic variation of influenza virus. Medical officials were surprised that the influenza vaccine was not effective in the fall-winter season of 1947. We now realize that the virus had shifted antigenically, making the vaccine mismatched to the circulating viral strain. By the early 1950s, annual immunization for all military personnel was routine, a policy continued ever since (4, 8, 10, 89–92).
Assessments of influenza vaccine containing various mineral-oil adjuvants in the late 1940s and 1950s were promising but not pursued. Despite concerns about the safety of the adjuvant vaccine, no prolonged morbidity or mortality effects were evident two decades after immunization (4, 10, 93, 94).
Memories of the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic arose again when an outbreak of severe respiratory illness occurred in a basic training camp at Fort Dix, New Jersey. Among 230 infected soldiers, 13 were severely ill, with one fatality in February 1976 (95–100). Scientifically designated A/New Jersey/76 (H1N1), this viral strain was called "swine flu" by the public. This finding set in motion a process that led to the National Influenza Immunization Program, in which the Department of Defense participated (99, 100). In November 1976, several cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome, a demyelinating neuromuscular disorder, were reported from Minnesota. Nationwide, 532 cases (32 fatal) were reported among vaccinees, mostly civilians. Epidemiologic investigation suggested an increased risk among civilian influenza vaccine recipients that year (101–104) but not among military vaccine recipients (105).
One of the starkest modern examples of the importance of preventing influenza in military communities comes from the USS Arkansas in February 1996 (106). After influenza virus that did not match the strains used for immunization entered the ship's spaces, 42 percent of the ship's company became ill. The rate of incapacitating illness was sufficient to cause the ship to cancel its training exercise and make an unscheduled return to the nearest port.
Today, all active-duty members and most personnel in the National Guard or military reserves are immunized annually, usually by the end of December. Basic trainees receive influenza vaccine through its empirical June 30 expiration date each year. Antiviral medications are not widely used for prophylaxis, because of the superior protection provided by immunization. The Department of Defense sponsors an extensive, global, laboratory-based influenza surveillance program (107). This surveillance system contributed the clinical isolate used to develop the A/Panama/2007/99 (H3N2) influenza vaccine strain in influenza vaccines used from the fall of 2000 to early 2004 (108).
With contemporary concern about influenza A/H5N1 mutating into a pandemic form, the lessons from 1918 and 1976 are being relearned around the world. The Department of Defense is actively engaged in surveillance and planning. It purchased stockpiles of neuraminidase inhibitors to protect the nation's capabilities until a pandemic-strain influenza vaccine could be manufactured and provide durable immunity.
Meningococcal disease
Meningococcal meningitis is a life-threatening bacterial infection that can spread rapidly in dense populations, as in military training camps, colleges, and religious pilgrimages (4). The disease occurred with disturbing frequency in military trainees in the 1960s. Antibiotic prophylaxis was used initially, but the Neisseria meningitidis organisms became increasingly drug resistant.
In 1966, a meningococcal research unit was organized at WRAIR (3–5, 7, 8, 13, 14, 109–111). In 1968, scientists led by Goldschneider, Gotschlich, and Artenstein at WRAIR developed a serogroup C vaccine that prevented disease and also reduced the bacterial carrier rate. This was the first modern polysaccharide vaccine. Clinical trials were conducted in thousands of military trainees. Later, they developed its serogroup A counterpart vaccine.
Widespread use of meningococcal A/C vaccine among US military trainees began in 1971. A combination of immunization and smaller class sizes reduced the risk for fatal meningococcal disease during basic training (3–5, 13, 112). A tetravalent vaccine against serogroups A, C, and Y and W-135 combined (Menomune; Sanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, Pennsylvania) received a US license in January 1978 (113).
Meningococcal immunization marked another advance in January 2005 when the Food and Drug Administration licensed a protein-conjugated meningococcal vaccine (Menactra; Sanofi Pasteur). Its protein-conjugated characteristics promise prolonged duration of immunity compared with polysaccharide immunization (8). The Department of Defense is currently transitioning from Menomune to Menactra for military personnel and has adopted national immunization recommendations for adolescent beneficiaries. Unfortunately, attempts to develop a serogroup B meningococcal vaccine have not yet been fruitful.
Adenoviruses
After World War II, adenovirus infections (particularly serotypes 4 and 7) were linked with epidemic acute respiratory disease outbreaks in training camps and noted to infect up to 80 percent of military trainees (4, 114–123). Before widespread immunization of trainees, 600–800 acute respiratory-disease hospitalizations per week occurred at military basic-training sites in the northern United States in the early 1960s, disabling 40–50 percent of these closed communities.
In 1956, WRAIR developed formalin-inactivated vaccines against adenovirus types 4 and 7 (3–5, 7, 8, 13, 91, 92, 114–116, 124). Maurice Hilleman's team at WRAIR demonstrated in 1958 that inactivated adenovirus vaccine types 4 and 7 reduced adenovirus disease incidence by 60–90 percent among US soldiers under the stressful and crowded conditions of basic training, with cross-protection against type 3.
In 1963, viral seed lots for this vaccine were found to contain the oncogenic simian virus 40 as well as the simian virus 40 genome in the adenovirus capsids (32, 125–127). Safety concerns and lack of efficacy caused the product to be withdrawn from distribution. Several studies have shown no elevated risk of cancer in these vaccine recipients. The live types 4 and 7 adenoviruses used in the modern products have been shown not to be oncogenic (128).
In 1964, clinical trials of live, attenuated type 4 vaccine began at WRAIR (3–5, 7, 8, 13, 117–119, 121–123, 129). Trials of type 7 began in 1969 and of type 21 in 1971. Type 7 adenovirus vaccine was added to the regimen given American military trainees in 1970. These vaccines were developed as oral tablets in the 1970s, using viruses serially passaged but not attenuated (130), and licensed in July 1980. A report estimated that the vaccine saved the Army about $5 million a year in 1973 dollars (120). The tablets were given shortly after trainees' arrival at a basic training center, triggering no respiratory manifestations (90, 130). Adenovirus vaccines produced dramatic reductions in disease incidence.
By 1984, both vaccines were routinely administered as tablets to trainees at all basic-training camps the year round. Unfortunately, the manufacturer (Wyeth Laboratories, Madison, New Jersey) and the Department of Defense did not make capital improvements to the manufacturing facilities for these vaccines, and production ceased in 1996 (11). The last lots of these vaccines expired in 1998. Since then, disease outbreaks among trainee populations have recurred, including several deaths (128, 131–134). A replacement manufacturing line for adenovirus type 4 and type 7 vaccines will be subjected to regulatory review (11, 135, 136).
Measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella
During the Revolutionary War and the Civil War, measles was one of the principal causes of death among troops. Measles and secondary pneumonias in 1917 led to 48,000 hospitalizations and 1 million lost work days and represented 30 percent of all Army deaths, including combat deaths (44, 137, 138). During 1917 and early 1918, measles and mumps were leading causes of hospitalization and days lost from active service by members of the American Expeditionary Force in Europe (17, 44, 137, 139). During World War II, measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella accounted for over 300,000 hospital admissions or restrictions to quarters (140, 141). Even into the 1970s, measles and rubella caused a substantial number of hospitalizations and lost training time at basic training centers (90).
In 1961, Paul Parkman and his colleagues at WRAIR were codiscoverers of the rubella virus, isolating the virus among trainees at Fort Dix (4, 141). Vaccines to prevent measles, mumps, and rubella were licensed in the United States between 1963 and 1969. The AFEB helped to fund development of an attenuated measles vaccine (142). Indeed, the AFEB represented a major national source of grant funding for military and civilian biomedical researchers from the 1940s to the 1970s (10, 11, 53).
For military trainees, rubella vaccine was adopted first, in 1972, with measles vaccine added in 1980 to immunize those who evaded infection as children (10, 143, 144). Mumps outbreaks were less common than were the other two diseases, so mumps immunization was not uniformly adopted until 1991 (11, 145). A varicella policy of screening and as-needed immunization was also adopted in 1991 (11). The Food and Drug Administration licensed varicella vaccine in 1995. Now that a large proportion of basic trainees enter military service immune to these infections because of childhood immunization, the Services are increasingly testing for antibody and exempting those already immune (11, 146–152).
Diphtheria
Diphtheria toxoid was first licensed in the United States in 1926 and was later combined with tetanus toxoid to simplify the task of injecting the two products. Diphtheria toxoid, however, was known to cause substantial injection-site swelling if injected into someone already immune to diphtheria. So diphtheria immunization policy was complicated by whether or not to perform the Schick skin test to determine if an individual was immune (induration after injecting diphtheria toxin is considered a positive test, implying susceptibility) (8, 15, 153, 154).
Military clinicians noted the injection-site swelling that followed diphtheria toxoid administration in adults and developed a reduced-dose formulation. The work of Geoffrey Edsall and colleagues at the Great Lakes Naval Training Center in the 1950s demonstrated that this approach was comparably immunogenic, but with fewer injection-site symptoms (4, 8, 155, 156).
|
PROPHYLAXIS OF DISEASES WITH ECOLOGIC NICHES |
|---|
Deployment vaccines include those vaccines administered to personnel sent to regions where the risk of contracting a specific endemic vaccine-preventable disease is increased. Deployment vaccines include typhoid, hepatitis B, meningococcal, yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, and rabies. The first few were discussed above. Beyond its use in military basic training, meningococcal immunization may be required for specific assignments (e.g., personnel traveling to sub-Saharan Africa during the dry season) (67).
Yellow fever
Yellow fever was a significant problem for US troops throughout the southern United States in the 19th century. This infection was especially troublesome during the Spanish-American War of 1898, particularly in Cuba (3–5, 7, 13, 14, 17, 32, 157, 158). To investigate, Army Surgeon General Sternberg appointed another board of investigation. Walter Reed and his colleagues proved Carlos Finlay's hypothesis of transmission of the disease by mosquito (159–163). The follow-up research ultimately led to isolation of the virus. Separately, Max Thieler attenuated yellow-fever virus by serial cell culture passage in 1927.
During World War II, yellow fever was considered as a natural threat, with speculation about its potential as a biologic weapon if adversaries could release infected mosquitoes (164). As a result, a yellow-fever immunization program was instituted for selected personnel in the US Armed Forces.
By April 1942, 7 million doses of the vaccine had been given. The program was complicated by reports of hepatitis in recipients (3–5, 13, 55, 57, 69, 70). In March 1942, 100 cases of jaundice and hepatitis were noted at training camps in California soon after yellow-fever immunization. Health authorities quickly realized that the diluent for yellow-fever vaccine contained human serum albumin that had not been heat treated. The albumin was contaminated with a previously unrecognized virus that caused hepatitis (i.e., hepatitis B virus). Immunizations ceased, and the Rockefeller Foundation stopped producing the serum-containing product midway through 1942, until it could develop a serum-free formulation. By December 1942, over 50,000 cases of hepatitis B and 84 deaths followed some 2.5 million yellow-fever immunizations from certain lots. This accident helped to reveal the differences between hepatitis A (then called "infectious hepatitis") and the newly recognized hepatitis B virus ("serum hepatitis").
In 1985, follow-up studies interviewed and seroscreened 597 Army veterans from 1942. The authors concluded that hepatitis B virus caused the outbreak, that about 330,000 persons may have been infected, that the hepatitis B virus carrier state was a rare consequence, and that the outbreak induced hepatitis B-specific antibodies that appear to persist for life (165). The small excess liver cancer mortality seen in a related cohort study and the results of a case-control study are consistent, nevertheless, with the now well-established etiologic role of hepatitis B virus in liver cancer (166).
In addition to the hepatitis B issue, the yellow-fever vaccine of the 1940s was grown in eggs of chickens infected with avian leucosis virus. Evaluation identified no related harm in vaccine recipients (167).
From the 1950s onward, yellow-fever immunization for adults proceeded with few problems, until recently. Yellow-fever vaccine is a live, attenuated product given to personnel with assignments to yellow fever-endemic areas. As a general rule, personnel assigned to Latin America or sub-Saharan Africa or with missions that may take them to these regions are immunized. However, recent concerns about rare cases of yellow-fever vaccine-associated viscerotropic disease, including a female airman (168), raise questions about how best to balance the risks and benefits of immunization. Should military forces use yellow-fever vaccine narrowly (i.e., focused on those traveling soon) or broadly (i.e., focused on those who may travel eventually) to minimize the number of immunizations given just before departure? Military policy makers, in concert with medical consultants, work to balance the two competing objectives (11, 169). The goal is to optimize benefit and to minimize risk for service members.
Japanese encephalitis
A Japanese encephalitis vaccine based on a Russian vaccine was produced in 1943 through the efforts of Albert Sabin and colleagues in the Far Eastern theater. Japanese encephalitis vaccine was administered to a limited number of personnel in Japan (primarily Okinawa) in 1945 during an outbreak in the civilian population (5, 13, 17, 170, 171). This vaccine was derived from virus-infected mouse brain.
By the 1980s, military, diplomatic, and travelers' need for a Japanese encephalitis vaccine led to studies by military scientists that permitted US licensure of Department of Defense vaccine (8, 172–175). The Food and Drug Administration licensed Department of Defense vaccine in 1992. Because of an uncommon risk of delayed-onset urticaria and angioedema, the vaccine's labeling recommends deferring travel for 7–10 days after immunization. Current military policy provides this vaccine to military members on assignments to areas with a high endemicity of disease, primarily on Okinawa, with extended field exposure and rural areas of Thailand. The manufacturer intends to cease production in mouse brains and transition to a cell-culture production process.
Rabies
Today, rabies vaccine is provided before exposure to selected troops who have missions to areas endemic for rabies and who may have an elevated risk of being bitten by a rabid animal. The rationale for immunization focuses on troops who lack ready access to definitive medical care if bitten (e.g., special operations personnel). In addition, veterinarians, veterinary technicians, and those with animal-control responsibilities receive standard occupational immunization before exposure (8, 31, 175, 176).
|
PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST BIOWEAPONS |
|---|
Smallpox
The historical use of smallpox vaccine was addressed above. In December 2002, a national program of smallpox vaccination resumed, to counter the consequences of a malicious release of variola virus (29).
In a remarkable example of mass individualized immunization, more than 400,000 service members deploying to southwest Asia were screened for smallpox immunization (29). After a trial run at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, military clinics used standardized education materials, concise screening forms, bandages, and staff training to educate recipients about the idiosyncrasies of smallpox vaccination, to identify contraindications (e.g., atopic dermatitis), to safely administer the vaccine, and to care for the vaccination site appropriately.
The accompanying prospective surveillance system identified an elevated risk of myopericarditis in the second week after primary smallpox vaccination, disproportionately among young adult Caucasian men (177–179). The military smallpox vaccination program continues in order to preserve critical military capabilities in case of an attack, with over 1,100,000 people screened and over 1,000,000 people vaccinated between December 2002 and April 2006.
Anthrax
The intelligence community and civilian experts consistently rank anthrax spores as the number one threat from bioweapons. This ranking is due to the stability of spores, which can persist for decades despite environmental extremes. Anthrax spores can be easily dispersed, as seen in the multiple releases via mailed letters or packages on the US eastern seaboard in the fall of 2001 (180, 181).
Early anthrax vaccines were developed at Fort Detrick, Maryland, by George G. Wright and colleagues (182–187). An aluminum-adsorbed anthrax vaccine was tested in a human field trial in the 1950s, demonstrating 92.5 percent reduction in disease incidence (cutaneous and inhalation cases combined) (188), and was licensed in 1970 (8, 189, 190). Subsequent inhalation challenges in nonhuman primates and rabbits showed greater than 95 percent protection against lethal challenge. A comprehensive review by the National Academy of Sciences affirmed the efficacy of anthrax vaccine adsorbed (186).
An estimated 150,000 American troops received one or two anthrax immunizations during the Persian Gulf War in 1991, but individual records were either not kept (in an attempt not to identify those unimmunized and hence vulnerable to enemy bioweapons) or were marked with terms such as "Vaccine A" (186, 191–195). In March 1998, a much larger immunization program began that has now administered over 5.6 million anthrax immunizations to over 1.5 million troops. Anthrax immunizations are primarily intended for people serving in areas judged to be at higher risk (e.g., southwest Asia, Korea), as well as military personnel with homeland biodefense roles.
Anthrax vaccine was the target of prolonged skepticism, evoking review by the National Academy of Sciences and an extraordinary array of postmarketing safety studies. These studies involved cohort studies of acute symptoms (196–204), hospitalizations (186, 205, 206), disability evaluations (207), and reproductive outcomes (208–210), as well as secondary review of the spontaneous reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (211, 212).
Public concerns about health problems against anthrax immunization encompassed so many divergent diagnoses (e.g., lupus erythematosus, hypothyroidism, diabetes, cancers, Guillain-Barré syndrome, multiple sclerosis) that epidemiologists conducted objective comparisons of anthrax-immunized and -unimmunized personnel for each major diagnostic group. The objective comparisons showed that the immunized and unimmunized cohorts had comparable rates of illness and health. Several of the cohort studies span observation for multiple years after immunization (186, 205–207, 209, 213, 214). Many of the individual concerns can now be understood as instances of the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.
After the National Academy of Sciences heard from vaccinees and comprehensively reviewed the accumulated scientific data, it concluded that anthrax vaccine has an adverse-reaction profile similar to that of other adult vaccines (186). The AFEB concurred (11). However, an elevated rate of injection-site pain and swelling, occasionally with peripheral neuropathy due to pinching of the ulnar nerve, is associated with administering a vaccine adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide by subcutaneous injection. Studies underway are evaluating rare adverse events (e.g., prolonged myalgia or arthralgia) and the relative effectiveness of intramuscular injection on immunogenicity and safety. The anthrax immunization program also pointed out needed improvements in the way the Department of Defense exchanges information with military personnel and their families and provides clinical immunization services in general.
Plague
A formalin-inactivated plague vaccine saw limited use during World War II (4, 16, 187). American soldiers deploying to Vietnam during the 1960s received a similar inactivated plague vaccine. Conversely, the South Vietnamese government gave the live EV or EV76 strain of plague vaccine to its soldiers (3, 4, 19, 187, 215–219). American use of plague vaccine declined substantially after the 1960s, given a relatively high degree of injection-site reactions and limited exposure to the bacteria. Today, no plague vaccine is licensed by the Food and Drug Administration (8, 11, 136, 220).
A plague vaccine is potentially of interest in countering bioweapon threats (221), but the previous whole-cell plague vaccine did not adequately protect mice against inhalation challenge with Yersinia pestis bacteria (222). Modern technology may provide an improved plague vaccine containing F1 and V proteins as the principal antigens (218, 219, 223).
|
PROPHYLAXIS OF OTHER INFECTIOUS HAZARDS |
|---|
Pneumococcal disease
Army Major George Sternberg discovered Streptococcus pneumoniae, the pneumococcus, in New Orleans, Louisiana, in 1880, shortly before Louis Pasteur did. Early successful tests of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines occurred at Camp Upton, New York, and Camp Wheeler, Georgia, in 1918–1919. The Army Medical School made 2 million doses of pneumococcal types I, II, and III vaccine in a few weeks toward the end of 1918.
During the 1930s, polyvalent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine was tested in five trials in 120,000 men at Civilian Conservation Corps camps (5, 8, 13, 14, 17, 82, 224–227). In 1937, Frank Horsfall prepared a therapeutic rabbit pneumococcal antiserum. Equine or rabbit pneumococcal antiserum was available from several sources as late as 1965 (5, 8).
Successful clinical trials of pneumococcal vaccine were conducted in military trainees in 1944–1945 at the Sioux Falls Army Air Force Technical School, where a high incidence rate of pneumococcal infections was found (3–5, 13, 226, 227). Pneumococcal vaccines were not widely prescribed because of greater confidence in another newly introduced drug, penicillin. The vaccines were voluntarily withdrawn by the manufacturer in 1954, because of lack of acceptance and low sales.
Today, 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine is given to asplenic military personnel. On the basis of episodic outbreaks, the vaccine has also been given to selected Marine Corps and special operations trainees; its value in training settings is being evaluated (11, 228, 229).
Poliovirus
In 1955, the US government licensed Jonas Salk's inactivated poliovirus vaccine. In 1961, the first of several formulations of Albert Sabin's oral attenuated vaccine was licensed. One year later, the oral polio vaccine largely replaced the Salk vaccine in the United States (8, 19).
Initially, military poliovirus immunization was a "catch-up" program for adults who had not been immunized as children. Basic training centers switched from injectable vaccine to oral vaccine once the trivalent oral product became available in the early 1960s (10, 11, 230).
Historical notes
Several immunizations given to earlier generations of American troops, but no longer used, are worthy of brief mention. The military immunization experience includes long-term follow-up of laboratory personnel who received multiple common and exotic vaccines (213, 231–236).
A formalin-inactivated typhus vaccine was provided primarily to troops serving in Europe during World War II and then in the Korean and Vietnam wars. Plotz and colleagues at WRAIR helped purify the specific antigen. The vaccine prevented louse-borne (epidemic) typhus but not murine or scrub typhus. The microbes, cultured in chicken-embryo yolk sacs and inactivated with formaldehyde, were first licensed for general use in 1941 (3–5, 8, 10, 237–240). However, subsequent attempts to purify this vaccine resulted in inadequate potency, so immunization eventually gave way to insecticides and antibiotics. Production ceased voluntarily in 1980, and the last batch expired in 1981.
During the late 1980s, an inactivated tick-borne encephalitis vaccine produced in Austria was administered as an investigational vaccine to certain inspectors enforcing the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (11, 136). These inspectors regularly visited rural and forested areas of the Soviet Union that are highly endemic for tick-borne encephalitis. A similar product was used in 1996 during the US military deployment to Bosnia (8, 11, 136, 175, 241, 242).
In the 1950s, IGIM was used to treat patients deficient in the antibody-rich, gamma-globulin fraction of serum, first described by Colonel Ogden C. Bruton, an Army pediatrician at Walter Reed Army Hospital (243–245). His discovery opened new approaches in passive immunization and the diagnosis and treatment of humoral (antibody) immune deficiencies. Human hyperimmune globulins largely replaced corresponding equine antisera and antitoxins in the 1960s (8, 10, 47).
In the 1980s, Major Mark Fischer, Val Hemming, and their colleagues showed that a polyvalent, high-titer, respiratory syncytial virus immune globulin was effective prophylaxis in infants. Their work at the Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences established the cotton-rat model of respiratory syncytial virus disease (8, 139, 246, 247).
|
VACCINE-SAFETY SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS |
|---|
Even with the success of immunization in reducing the incidence of the diseases discussed above, the military health system faces the same challenges that the civilian public-health sector does—increasing concerns about vaccine safety and adverse events experienced after immunization. Vocal objection to military immunization programs occurred with variolation in the 1770s (7, 17), smallpox and typhoid vaccines in the 1910s (28, 38), various vaccines in World War II (15), and anthrax vaccine in the 1990s (186).
The military health system that implements immunization programs also has a responsibility to implement safety surveillance programs (11). In recent times, these surveillance programs may be best exemplified by assessments of anthrax vaccine safety and smallpox vaccine safety, where the Department of Defense has been the primary user of these vaccines (29, 177–179, 186, 196–214). A Navy allergist was among the first to recognize the role of gelatin in vaccine-associated anaphylaxis (248).
|
PRACTICAL ISSUES IN PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION |
|---|
Most vaccines require continuous refrigeration. A few require storage in a freezer. Maintaining the "cold chain" to ensure injection of potent vaccines appears simple but requires considerable effort (8, 15–18). In World War II, smallpox vaccine was transported by propeller-driven aircraft over long distances, using kerosene-powered refrigerators or packed in dry ice. Improper vaccine storage was one of the principal factors in breakthrough infections. In January 1946, a special shipment of smallpox vaccine was ordered from the US mainland, after doubts arose about the potency of vaccine on the Korean peninsula (27, 249). Today, monitoring devices can record the temperature of vaccine shipments, allowing improperly handled product to be replaced rather than injected.
Documentation of immunizations is important to record a health-care encounter and to avoid redundant immunization at future health-care visits. During World War II, tetanus immunizations were marked on troops' identification tags ("dog tags"; figure 3) and on paper records (figures 1 and 2). Increasingly since the 1990s, the Department of Defense uses electronic immunization tracking systems (i.e., registries) to permanently record immunizations, even if paper records are lost (11, 250).
The administration of immunizations to new military personnel is based on several assumptions. First, accession physical examinations establish that trainees comprise a healthy population without underlying conditions known to predispose people to serious adverse effects from immunization (e.g., immune deficiencies). Second, most trainees are assumed to have been exposed to childhood vaccine antigens through natural infection or childhood immunization programs. Vaccines with highest priority are those to prevent infections most transmissible in closed settings (e.g., meningococcal disease, influenza, measles, varicella) (9).
During training, accessions must acquire immunity to multiple infections within a short period of time. Thus, simultaneous immunizations have been provided to tens of millions of trainees since World War II (10, 11, 213, 225, 232, 234, 236, 250). The AFEB considered the issue in 2004 and concluded that available data "do not demonstrate serious or long-term adverse health effects causally related to multiple, concurrent immunizations, and there is no reason to deviate from current consensus guidelines for adult immunization" (251, p. 3). Similarly, an Institute of Medicine committee (252) and others (253) found that the evidence favors rejecting a conclusion that simultaneous immunization causes heterologous infection, type-1 diabetes, or other patterns of adverse events. Additional work is needed to identify risk factors that might predispose to rare problems.
Because American adolescents today have a high degree of preexisting immunity, the Department of Defense increasingly uses seroscreening to individualize immunizations according to personal vulnerabilities (11, 146–152, 254–257). Training sites are planning to separate immunizations into clusters based on acute versus long-range need. The first cluster would protect against pathogens posing an imminent risk in closed communities (e.g., influenza; meningococcal; measles, mumps, rubella; varicella). The second cluster would protect against pathogens posing a threat later in military service (e.g., hepatitis A, hepatitis B, poliovirus, tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis).
Additional vaccines can be given later during training. The Marine Corps, for example, administers yellow fever vaccine to trainees late in the training cycle. Typhoid or rabies immunization can be started during advanced or specialty training, on the basis of the first assignment or occupational specialty, respectively (9).
Jet-injection devices were first developed in the private sector in the 1940s. Military scientists adapted the early devices to create needle-free, multiuse-nozzle jet injectors capable of 600 or more subcutaneous injections per hour from 1949 onward, primarily for basic training camps. The Army's Aaron Ismach and Abram Benenson developed a nozzle for intradermal vaccination, used in civilian mass smallpox immunization campaigns in the 1960s (4, 10, 20, 258–262). Unfortunately, the device's use of the same unsterile nozzle and fluid pathway to provide injections to consecutive patients allowed transmission of blood-borne pathogens (e.g., hepatitis B, human immunodeficiency virus) in civilian settings, and the devices have fallen into disfavor (263, 264). In contrast, a new generation of disposable-cartridge jet injectors is being developed to avoid these safety concerns by using a disposable, sterile fluid pathway for each patient.
|
RESEARCH PORTFOLIO |
|---|
Military personnel confront infectious hazards for which there are not yet licensed vaccines. Over the past few decades, the US military medical research community, working with civilian partners, developed several investigational vaccines, toxoids, and immune globulins to counter specific military threats associated with high morbidity. These threats included both natural, endemic diseases and microbes that could be deployed as bioweapons (136, 175). Such vaccines have been studied to prevent Argentine hemorrhagic fever (Junín virus) (158, 265, 266), botulism (267), chikungunya (158, 268, 269), dengue fever (265, 270), eastern equine encephalitis (271), Ebola fever (158, 265, 272, 273), Escherichia coli (34, 274), hepatitis E (275), human immunodeficiency virus disease (276–279), Lassa fever (158, 265, 272), malaria (280–283), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (284), N. meningitidis serogroup B (285, 286), Q fever (187, 287, 288), Rift Valley fever (158, 265, 289–293), shigellosis (34, 294), tularemia (187, 236, 295–298), Venezuelan equine encephalitis (3, 175, 236, 299–301), and western equine encephaltitis (302). A gonococcal vaccine produced neutralizing antibodies but was not sufficiently protective in a field trial (279, 303).
New versions of some of the older vaccines are in early clinical trials, including recombinant botulinum bivalent AB vaccine and live attenuated Venezuelan equine encephalitis V3526 vaccine (304). Next-generation anthrax vaccines in clinical trials include recombinant protective antigen vaccine and a vaccine adjuvanted with CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (305–307) (in genetics, "CpG" is a site where cytosine (C) lies next to guanine (G) in the DNA sequence; the "p" indicates that C and G are connected by a phosphodiester bond). The role of anthrax capsule/exosporium and toxin proteins and spores is being evaluated in animal models. A F1-V plague vaccine should enter clinical trials soon (223). Vaccines advancing toward clinical trials include staphylococcal enterotoxin B/A vaccine (308), hantavirus vaccine (158, 309, 310), and next-generation eastern equine encephalitis and western equine encephaltitis vaccines (175, 300, 311). Novel approaches being pursued include RNA replicons as vaccines against Marburg and other filoviruses (312, 313) and DNA vaccines against hantavirus (314). The candidate malaria vaccine known as "RTS,S" reduced the rate of parasitemia by 37 percent and severe malaria by 58 percent over a 6-month period in Mozambiquean children (281, 282).
Venezuelan equine encephalitis vaccines were given to 2 million horses in Texas to control an equine outbreak there that had contributed to 84 human deaths (3, 175). During an outbreak in the Sinai peninsula, until 1979, the formalin-inactivated Rift Valley vaccine was given to 963 Swedish soldiers under the United Nations' peace-keeping flag (291, 292, 315, 316). More than 175,000 doses of the Argentine hemorrhagic fever vaccine have been administered in Argentina, dramatically reducing disease incidence (158). About 8,000 troops received the investigational botulinum pentavalent (ABCDE) toxoid during the Persian Gulf War (191–195). Successful vaccine research may not be carried through to commercial development and licensure, such as improved vaccines against Rocky Mountain spotted fever developed at WRAIR (240, 317, 318).
Similar to the movement toward more combination vaccines for children, multiagent vaccines for military personnel are also a priority. A panfilovirus vaccine protecting against Marburg and Ebola variants may be possible within a decade. Novel delivery systems being pursued include aerosols, microneedle or adjuvanted patches, and oral dosage forms.
Military personnel need vaccines that are 1) safe (associated with few adverse reactions); 2) effective (substantial reduction in disease incidence); 3) easy to administer; 4) robust (long-lasting immunity, prolonged shelf life, tolerant of shipping conditions); and 5) affordable (offering good value for the price paid). The ideal vaccine formulation would produce prolonged immunity against several diseases through a single dose. Genetically engineered products may lend themselves to this ideal. Adjuvant research will help (319). Yet even with 20 years' experience in biotechnology, the development and licensing process is no shorter or simpler than it was in the 1980s.
If infection cannot be prevented outright, passively acquired immunity may be clinically useful. The Department of Defense has investigated the use of human immune globulin preparations (e.g., hyperimmune globulins, antitoxins) to treat or protect against Klebsiella and Pseudomonas infections in burned or severely wounded patients (320) and to provide passive protection against Lassa fever (158, 265), Ebola fever (265, 321), Bolivian hemorrhagic fever (caused by Machupo virus) (158, 322), and botulism (323). The Department of Defense has assisted in the development and evaluation of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of anthrax infection (324).
The Department of Defense invests in research and development of countermeasures to natural infectious diseases and bioweapons that might harm military personnel, as described above. In addition, the Department of Defense will take advantage of the fruits of private-sector research and development, such as vaccines to prevent papillomavirus-related cervical cancer and herpes zoster.
|
SUMMARY |
|---|
In 1900, smallpox vaccine was generally available, rabies vaccine found limited use as postexposure prophylaxis after animal bites, and typhoid vaccine was just coming to public attention. A century later, 22 serious infections can be prevented with Food and Drug Administration-licensed vaccines (7–9). As vaccines increase in number and national focus on vaccine safety continues, the complexity of managing clinical immunization challenges will undoubtedly increase. Information technologies are increasingly used to disseminate immunization information (e.g., www.vaccines.mil) and to conduct long-distance, on-demand training (e.g., https://www.projectimmunereadiness.amedd.army.mil/).
Military immunization programs maintain the health of soldiers, marines, sailors, airmen, and coast guardsmen, the most important resources within the Department of Defense, the resources most critical to military success. These people deserve the best available protective measures.
Some immunization needs are universal for all in military service (e.g., tetanus), while others derive from specific environmental or occupational risks (e.g., Japanese encephalitis, rabies). Military immunization programs, however, need to be individualized on the basis of personal contraindications and prior immunity. The proper conduct of military immunization programs respects the need for detailed education of military personnel about the immunizations they get, maximizes quality in immunization delivery, and supports quality clinical care to prevent and treat adverse events after immunization.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
The critical comments on early versions of this manuscript by Dr. Leonard N. Binn, Lieutenant Colonel Stephen M. Ford, Colonel (Retired) Joel C. Gaydos, Colonel (Retired) Frederick E. Gerber, Colonel (Retired) Charles H. Hoke, Jr., Colonel (Retired) Richard N. Miller, Colonel (Retired) Ernest T. Takafuji, Colonel Gaston M. Randolph, Jr., Major General (Retired) Philip K. Russell, Colonel (Retired) Edmund C. Tramont, and Captain Bruce G. Weniger are gratefully acknowledged. The authors also recognize the library-science skills of Yevetta White, Emily A. Court, and Blythe Carey who enhanced this manuscript.
The opinions and assertions contained herein are those of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the US Army or the Department of Defense.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
- Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Policy. (2005) Veteran data & information (Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC) (www.va.gov/vetdata/). Accessed March 17, 2006.
- Takafuji ET and Russell PK. (1990) Military immunizations: past, present, and future prospects. Infect Dis Clin North Am 4:143–58.[Medline]
- Woodward TE. (1981) The public's debt to military medicine. Mil Med 146:168–73.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Benenson AS. (1984) Immunization and military medicine. Rev Infect Dis 6:1–12.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Parish HJ. (1965) A history of immunizations (E&S Livingstone, Ltd, London, United Kingdom).
- Hospenthal DR. (2005) History of U.S. military contributions to the understanding, prevention, and treatment of infectious diseases: an overview. Mil Med 170:suppl, 1–2.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Artenstein AW, Opal JM, Opal SM, et al. (2005) History of U.S. military contributions to the study of vaccines against infectious diseases. Mil Med 170:suppl, 3–11.[Medline]
- Grabenstein JD. (2006) ImmunoFacts: vaccines and immunologic drugs (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc, Saint Louis, MO).
- US Department of Defense. U.S. Army regulation 40-562; Navy Bureau of Medicine & Surgery instruction 6230.15; Air Force joint instruction 48-110; Coast Guard commandant instruction M6230.4F. In: Immunizations & chemoprophylaxis. Washington, DC: Department of Defense (in press).
- Woodward TE. (1990) The Armed Forces Epidemiological Board: its first 50 years. (Department of the Army, Falls Church, VA) (http://history.amedd.army.mil/booksdocs/itsfirst50yrs/default.htm).
- Armed Forces Epidemiological Board. (1999) Vaccines in the military: a Department of Defense-wide review of vaccine policy and practice. A report for the Armed Forces Epidemiological Board, August 1999. (Department of Defense, Washington, DC) (www.ha.osd.mil/afeb/reports/vaccines.pdf).
- Gillett MC. (1981) The Army Medical Department, 1775–1818. (US Army Center of Military History, Washington, DC) 75: (http://history.amedd.army.mil/booksdocs/rev/gillett1/frameindex.html).
- Chase A. (1982) Magic shots (William Morrow, New York, NY).
- Plotkin SL and Plotkin SA. (2003) A short history of vaccination. In Plotkin SA and Orenstein WB (Eds.). Vaccines 4th ed (Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA) pp. 1–12.
- Long AP. (1955) The Army immunization program. In Coates JB Jr and Hoff EC (Eds.). Preventive medicine in World War II. Vol . III. Personal health measures and immunization (Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, Washington, DC) pp. 271–341 (http://history.amedd.army.mil/booksdocs/wwii/PrsnlHlthMsrs/chapter8.htm).
- Long AP. (1944) Immunizations in the United States Army. Am J Public Health 34:27–33.
[Free Full Text] - Bayne-Jones S. (1968) The evolution of preventive medicine in the United States Army, 1607–1939. (Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, Washington, DC) (http://history.amedd.army.mil/booksdocs/misc/evprev/frameindex.html).
- Cowdrey AE. (1987) United States Army in the Korean War: the medics' war. (Center of Military History, United States Army, Washington, DC)60–1 147–8, 224.
- Mullins WS. (1986) A decade of progress, the United States Army Medical Department, 1959–1969. (Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, Washington, DC)34.
- Fenner F, Henderson DA, Arita I, et al. (1988) Smallpox and its eradication (World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland).
- Rabasa R. (1986) George Washington and variolation; Edward Jenner and vaccination. (Letter). JAMA 255:1881.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Bollet AJ. (1988) The history of smallpox and its influence on military campaigns: part 1. Resid Staff Physician 34:135–40.
- Sherk HH. (2001) Smallpox at the Morristown encampment. N J Med 98:41–6.[Medline]
- Fenn EA. (2001) Pox Americana: the great smallpox epidemic of 1775–82. (Hill & Wang, New York, NY).
- Freemon FR. (1987) Administration of the Medical Department of the Confederate States Army, 1861 to 1865. South Med J 80:630–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Bollet AJ. (2005) Military medicine in the Spanish-American War. Perspect Biol Med 48:293–300.[Medline]
- Potter LA. (1958) Smallpox. In Coates JB Jr and Hoff EC (Eds.). Preventive medicine in World War II. Vol . IV. Communicable diseases transmitted chiefly through respiratory & alimentary tracts (Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, Washington, DC) pp. 151–63.
- Higgins CM. (1920) Horrors of vaccination exposed and illustrated (DeVinne Press, New York, NY).
- Grabenstein JD and Winkenwerder W Jr. (2003) U.S. military smallpox vaccination program experience. JAMA 289:3278–82.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Mendez E Jr. (1990) Temporary discontinuation of routine smallpox vaccinations for military recruits. (Memorandum) (Department of Defense, Washington, DC).
- Hall RD. (1981) Rabies in Europe: history and military impact. Med Bull US Army Eur 38:20–4.
- Bayne-Jones S. (1967) Walter Reed (1851–1902). Mil Med 132:391–400.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Tigertt WD. (1959) The initial effort to immunize American soldier volunteers with typhoid vaccine. Mil Med 124:342–9.[Medline]
- Lim ML, Murphy GS, Calloway M, et al. (2005) History of U.S. military contributions to the study of diarrheal diseases. Mil Med 170:suppl, 30–8.[Medline]
- Reed W, Vaughan VC, Shakespeare EO. (1940) Preliminary report on typhoid fever in military camps in the US, 1898 (Army Medical Field Service School, Carlisle Barracks, PA) (Army medical bulletin no. 53).
- Vaughn VC. (1902) The etiology and spread of typhoid fever. JAMA 38:979–88.
- Wright AE and Leishman WB. (1900) Remarks on the results which have been obtained by the antityphoid inoculations and on the methods which have been employed in the preparation of the vaccine. Br Med J i:122–9.
- Hardy A. (2000) "Straight back to barbarism": antityphoid inoculation and the Great War, 1914. Bull Hist Med 74:265–90.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Cantlie N. (1974) History of the Army Medical Department. Vol II (Churchill Livingstone, London, United Kingdom) pp. 230 373.
- Russell FF. (1910) The control of typhoid in the Army by vaccination. N Y State J Med 10:535–48.
- Russell FF. (1913) Antityphoid vaccination. Am J Med Sci 146:803–33.
- Holt RL and Hitchens AP. (1937) Typhoid vaccine: the technique of its preparation at the Army Medical School. Public Health Rep 52:829–44.[Web of Science]
- Callender GR and Luippold GF. (1943) The effectiveness of typhoid vaccine prepared by the U.S. Army. JAMA 123:319–21.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Vaughan VC and Palmer GT. (1918) Communicable disease in the United States Army during the summer and autumn of 1918. J Lab Clin Med 3:587–623 647–86.
- Landy M, Gaines S, Seal JR, et al. (1954) Antibody responses of man to three types of antityphoid immunizing agents: heat-phenol fluid vaccine, acetone-dehydrated vaccine, and isolated Vi and O antigens. Am J Public Health 44:1572–9.
[Free Full Text] - Simanjuntak CH, Paleologo FP, Punjabi NH, et al. (1991) Oral immunisation against typhoid fever in Indonesia with Ty21a vaccine. Lancet 338:1055–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Steihm ER. (1979) Standard and special human immune serum globulins as therapeutic agents. Pediatrics 63:301–19.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Lévy FM. (1975) A corner of history: the fiftieth anniversary of diphtheria and tetanus immunization. Prev Med 4:226–37.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Long AP. (1943) Tetanus toxoid, its use in the United States Army. Am J Public Health 33:53–7.
[Free Full Text] - Gottlieb S, McLaughlin FX, Levine L, et al. (1964) Long-term immunity to tetanus—a statistical evaluation and its clinical implications. Am J Public Health 54:961–71.
[Free Full Text] - Jansen DL, Gray GC, Putnam SD, et al. (1997) Evaluation of pertussis in U.S. Marine Corps trainees. Clin Infect Dis 25:1099–107.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Vincent JM, Cherry JD, Nauschuetz WF, et al. (2000) Prolonged afebrile nonproductive cough illnesses in American soldiers in Korea: a serological search for causation. Clin Infect Dis 30:534–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Paul JR. (1962) Armed Forces Epidemiological Board hepatitis researches: a review. Mil Med 127:987–93.
- Dooley DP. (2005) History of U.S. military contributions to the study of viral hepatitis. Mil Med 170:suppl, 71–6.[Medline]
- Rogers JA. (1942) The outbreak of jaundice in the Army. JAMA 120:51–3.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Cohn EJ, Oncley JL, Strong LE, et al. (1944) Chemical, clinical, and immunological studies on the products of human plasma fractionation. I. The characterization of the protein fractions of human plasma. J Clin Invest 23:417–32.[Medline]
- Havens WP Jr. (1968) . In Havens WP Jr (Ed.). Internal medicine in World War II. Vol . III. Infectious diseases and general medicine (Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, Washington, DC) pp. 331–84 (http://history.amedd.army.mil/booksdocs/wwii/internalmedicinevolIII/chapter13.htm).
- Department of Defense. (1971) Prophylactic gamma globulin for prevention of endemic hepatitis. Effects of U.S. gamma globulin upon the incidence of viral hepatitis and other infectious diseases in U.S. soldiers abroad. Arch Intern Med 128:723–38.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Grossman EB, Stewart SG, Stokes J Jr. (1945) Post-transfusion hepatitis in battle casualties and a study of its prophylaxis by means of human immune serum globulin. JAMA 129:991–4.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Stokes J Jr and Neefe JR. (1945) The prevention and attenuation of infectious hepatitis by gamma globulin: preliminary note. JAMA 127:144–5.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Conrad ME. (1969) Infectious hepatitis in military populations: problems encountered with gamma globulin prophylaxis. Bull N Y Acad Med 45:167–80.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Lemon SM, Gates N, Bancroft WH. (1980) Prevention of hepatitis with gamma globulin. Ann Intern Med 92:868–70.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Conrad ME and Lemon SM. (1987) Prevention of endemic icteric viral hepatitis by administration of immune serum gamma globulin. J Infect Dis 156:56–63.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Innis BL, Snitbhan R, Kunasol P, et al. (1994) Protection against hepatitis A by an inactivated vaccine. JAMA 271:1328–34.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Hoke CH Jr and Binn LN. (1992) Egan Department of Defense, et al. Hepatitis A in the U.S. Army: epidemiology and vaccine development. Vaccine 10:suppl, S75–9.[Medline]
- Rubertone MV, DeFraites RF, Krauss MR, et al. (1993) An outbreak of hepatitis A during a military field training exercise. Mil Med 158:37–41.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005) Health information for international travel, 2005–2006. (US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA).
- Krugman S. (1986) The Willowbrook hepatitis studies revisited: ethical aspects. Rev Infect Dis 8:157–62.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Sawyer WA, Meyer KF, Eaton MD, et al. (1944) Jaundice in Army personnel in the western region of the United States and its relation to vaccination against yellow fever: part I. Am J Hyg 39:337–430.[Web of Science]
- Sawyer WA, Meyer KF, Eaton MD, et al. (1944) Jaundice in Army personnel in the western region of the United States and its relation to vaccination against yellow fever: parts II, III and IV. Am J Hyg 40:35–107.[Web of Science]
- Bancroft HW, Kelley PW, Takafuji ET. (1990) The military and hepatitis B. Vaccine 8:suppl, S33–6.[Medline]
- Lemon SM, Miller RN, Pang LW, et al. (1984) Failure to achieve predicted antibody responses with intradermal and intramuscular human diploid cell rabies vaccine. Lancet i:1098–100.
- Ronish RH, Diniega BM, Kelley PW, et al. (1991) Immunogenicity achieved by the intradermal hepatitis B vaccination programme for U.S. Army soldiers in Korea. Vaccine 9:364–8.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Taylor DN, Sanchez JL, Castro JM, et al. (1999) Expanded safety and immunogenicity of a bivalent, oral, attenuated cholera vaccine, CVD 103-HgR plus CVD 111, in United States military personnel stationed in Panama. Infect Immun 67:2030–4.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Taylor DN, Cardenas V, Sanchez JL, et al. (2000) Two-year study of the protective efficacy of the oral whole cell plus recombinant B subunit cholera vaccine in Peru. J Infect Dis 181:1667–73.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Blood CG and Jolly R. (1995) Comparisons of disease and nonbattle injury incidence across various military operations. Mil Med 160:258–63.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Brenner IKM, Severs YD, Rhind SG, et al. (2000) Immune function and incidence of infection during basic infantry training. Mil Med 165:878–83.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Vaughan VC. (1918) An explosive epidemic of influenzal disease at Fort Oglethorpe. (Editorial). J Lab Clin Med 3:560–4.
- Soper GA. (1918) The influenza pneumonia pandemic in the American Army camps during September and October, 1918. Science 68:6–451.
- Bollet A. (1988) President Wilson and the blitzkatarrh. Resid Staff Physician 34:183–7 191.
- Byerly CR. (2005) Fever of war: the influenza epidemic in the U.S. Army during World War I (New York University Press, New York, NY).
- Barry JM. (2004) The great influenza: the epic story of the deadliest plague in history (Viking Adult, New York, NY).
- Leary T. (1918) The use of influenza vaccine in the present epidemic. Am J Public Health 8:754–5 768.
[Free Full Text] - Vaccines against influenza. Public Health Rep (1918) 1866.
- Value of vaccination against influenza. (Editorial). JAMA (1918) 71:1583.
[Free Full Text] - Siler JF. (1928) The U.S. Army Medical Department in the World War. Vol IX. Communicable and other diseases. (United States Army, Washington, DC)66–70 (http://history.amedd.army.mil/booksdocs/wwi/communicablediseases/default.htm).
- Francis T Jr. (1945) The development of the 1943 vaccination study of the Commission on Influenza. Am J Hyg 42:1–8.[Web of Science]
- Menke WJ Jr and Francis T Jr. Salk Department of Defense. (1945) A clinical, epidemiological, and immunological evaluation of vaccination against epidemic influenza. Am J Hyg 42:57–93.[Web of Science]
- Takafuji ET, Johnson DE, Segal HE. (1976) The swine antigen in previous influenza vaccines. (Letter). N Engl J Med 295:1018.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Meiklejohn G. (1983) Viral respiratory disease at Lowry Air Force Base in Denver, 1952–1982. J Infect Dis 148:775–84.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Hilleman MR. (1999) Personal historical chronicle of six decades of basic and applied research in virology, immunology, and vaccinology. Immunol Rev 170:7–27.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Hilleman MR. (2000) Vaccines in historic evolution and perspective: a narrative of vaccine discoveries. Vaccine 18:1436–47.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Davenport FM. (1968) Seventeen years' experience with mineral oil adjuvant influenza virus vaccines. Ann Allergy 26:288–92.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Beebe GW, Simon AH, Vivona S. (1972) Long-term mortality follow-up of Army recruits who received adjuvant influenza virus vaccine in 1951–1953. Am J Epidemiol 95:337–46.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Gaydos JC, Hodder RA, Top FH Jr, et al. (1977) Swine influenza A at Fort Dix, New Jersey (January–February 1976). I. Case finding and clinical study of cases. J Infect Dis 136:suppl, S356–62.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Gaydos JC, Hodder RA, Top FH Jr, et al. (1977) Swine influenza A at Fort Dix, New Jersey (January–February 1976). II. Transmission and morbidity in units with cases. J Infect Dis 136:suppl, S363–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Hodder RA, Gaydos JC, Allen RG, et al. (1977) Swine influenza A at Fort Dix, New Jersey (January–February 1976). III. Extent of spread and duration of the outbreak. J Infect Dis 136:suppl, S369–75.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Top FH Jr and Russell PK. (1977) Swine influenza A at Fort Dix, New Jersey (January–February 1976). IV. Summary and speculation. J Infect Dis 136:suppl, S376–80.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Neustadt R and Fineberg HV. (1983) The epidemic that never was: policy making in the swine flu scare (Vintage Books, New York, NY).
- Wade N. (1978) 1976 swine flu campaign faulted yet principals would do it again. Science 202:849–50.[Web of Science]
- Schonberger LB, Bregman DJ, Sullivan-Bolyai JZ, et al. (1979) Guillain-Barre syndrome following vaccination in the National Influenza Immunization Program, United States, 1976–1977. Am J Epidemiol 110:105–23.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Langmuir AD, Bregman DJ, Kurland LT, et al. (1984) An epidemiologic and clinical evaluation of Guillain-Barre syndrome reported in association with the administration of swine influenza vaccines. Am J Epidemiol 119:841–79.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Breman JG and Hayner NS. (1984) Guillain-Barre syndrome and its relationship to swine influenza vaccination in Michigan, 1976–1977. Am J Epidemiol 119:880–9.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Safranek TJ, Lawrence DN, Kurland LT, et al. (1991) Reassessment of the association between Guillain-Barre syndrome and receipt of swine influenza vaccine in 1976–1977: results of a two-state study. Am J Epidemiol 133:940–51.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Johnson DE. (1982) Guillain-Barre syndrome in the U.S. Army. Arch Neurol 39:21–4.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Earhart KC, Beadle C, Miller LK, et al. (2001) Outbreak of influenza in highly vaccinated crew of U.S. Navy ship. Emerg Infect Dis 7:463–5.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Canas LC, Lohman K, Pavlin JA, et al. (2000) The Department of Defense laboratory-based Global Influenza Surveillance System. Mil Med 165:52–6.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. (2000) Prevention and control of influenza. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 49:RR-31–38 (www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr4903.pdf).[Medline]
- Goldschneider I, Gotschlich EC, Artenstein MS. (1969) Human immunity to the meningococcus. I. The role of human immunity. J Exp Med 129:1307–26.[Abstract]
- Goldschneider I, Gotschlich EC, Artenstein MS. (1969) Human immunity to the meningococcus. II. The development of natural immunity. J Exp Med 129:1327–48.[Abstract]
- Gotschlich EC, Goldschneider I, Artenstein MS. (1969) Human immunity to the meningococcus. IV. Immunogenicity of group A and group C meningococcus polysaccharides in human volunteers. J Exp Med 129:1367–84.[Abstract]
- Brundage JF, Ryan MA, Feighner BH, et al. (2002) Meningococcal disease among United States military service members in relation to routine uses of vaccines with different serogroup-specific components, 1964–1998. Clin Infect Dis 35:1376–81.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. (2000) Prevention & control of meningococcal disease; meningococcal disease and college students. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 49:RR-71–20.[Medline]
- Hilleman MR, Werner JH, Adair CV, et al. (1955) Outbreak of acute respiratory illness caused by RI-67 and influenza A viruses, Fort Leonard Wood, 1952–1953. Am J Hyg 61:163–73.[Web of Science]
- Hilleman MR, Stallones RA, Gauld RL, et al. (1957) Vaccination against acute respiratory illness of adenovirus (RI-APC-ARD) etiology. Am J Public Health 47:841–7.
[Free Full Text] - Buescher EL. (1967) Respiratory disease and the adenoviruses. Med Clin North Am 51:769–79.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Top FH Jr, Grossman RA, Bartelloni PI, et al. (1971) Immunization with live types 7 and 4 vaccines. I. Safety, infectivity, antigenicity, and potency of adenovirus type 7 vaccine in humans. J Infect Dis 124:148–54.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Dudding BA, Top FH Jr, Scott RM, et al. (1972) An analysis of hospitalizations for acute respiratory disease in recruits immunized with adenovirus type 4 and type 7 vaccines. Am J Epidemiol 95:140–7.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Dudding BA, Top FH Jr, Winter PE, et al. (1973) Acute respiratory disease in military trainees. Am J Epidemiol 97:187–98.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Colis PB, Dudding BA, Winter PE, et al. (1973) Adenovirus vaccines in military recruit populations: a cost-benefit analysis. J Infect Dis 128:745–52.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Top FH Jr. (1975) Control of adenovirus acute respiratory disease in U.S. Army trainees. Yale J Biol Med 48:185–95.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Takafuji ET, Gaydos JC, Allen RG, et al. (1979) Simultaneous administration of live, enteric-coated adenovirus types 4, 7, and 21 vaccines: safety and immunogenicity. J Infect Dis 140:48–53.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Gaydos CA and Gaydos JC. (1995) Adenovirus vaccines in the U.S. military. Mil Med 160:300–4.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Culver JO, Lennette EH, Flintjer JD. (1959) Adenovirus vaccine: a field evaluation of protective efficacy against respiratory disease. Am J Hyg 69:120–6.[Web of Science]
- Simian virus 40 (SV40): a possible human polyomavirus. Symposium proceedings. Bethesda, Maryland, USA. January 27–28, 1997. Dev Biol Stand 1998;94:1–406.
- JAMA Strickler HD, Rosenberg PS, Devesa SS, et al. (1998) Contamination of poliovirus vaccines with simian virus 40 (1955–1963) and subsequent cancer rates. 279:292–5.
- Institute of Medicine. (2002) Immunization safety review: simian virus-40 contamination of polio vaccine and cancer. (National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC) (www.nap.edu/catalog/10534.html).
- Rollison DE, Page WF, Crawford H, et al. (2004) Case-control study of cancer among U.S. Army veterans exposed to simian virus 40-contaminated adenovirus vaccine. Am J Epidemiol 160:317–24.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Gooch WM 3rd and Mogabgab WJ. (1972) Simultaneous oral administration of live adenovirus types 4 and 7 vaccines: protection and lack of emergence of other types. Arch Environ Health 25:388–94.[Medline]
- Gaydos CA and Gaydos JC. (2003) Adenovirus vaccine. In Plotkin SA and Orenstein WB (Eds.). Vaccines 4th ed (Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA) pp. 863–85.
- Barraza EM, Ludwig SL, Gaydos JC, et al. (1999) Reemergence of adenovirus type 4 acute respiratory disease in military trainees: report of an outbreak during a lapse in vaccination. J Infect Dis 179:1531–3.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Gray GC, Goswami PR, Malasig MD, et al. (2000) Adult adenovirus infections: loss of orphaned vaccines precipitates military respiratory disease epidemics. Clin Infect Dis 31:663–70.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Two fatal cases of adenovirus-related illness in previously healthy young adults—Illinois, 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2001) 50:553–5.[Medline]
- Ryan MA, Gray GC, Smith B, et al. (2002) Large epidemic of respiratory illness due to adenovirus types 7 and 3 in healthy young adults. Clin Infect Dis 34:577–82.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Hyer RN, Howell MR, Ryan MA, et al. (2000) Cost-effectiveness analysis of reacquiring and using adenovirus types 4 and 7 vaccines in naval recruits. Am J Trop Med Hyg 62:613–18.[Abstract]
- Lemon SM, Thaul S, Fisseha S, et al. (2002) Protecting our forces: improving vaccine acquisition and availability in the U.S. military (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).
- Vaughan VC. (1918) Measles and pneumonia in our camps. (Editorial). J Lab Clin Med 3:248–57.
- Byerly CR. (2005) Fever of war: the influenza epidemic in the U.S. Army during World War I (New York University Press, New York, NY).
- Ottolini MG and Burnett MW. (2005) History of U.S. military contributions to the study of respiratory infections. Mil Med 170:suppl, 66–70.[Medline]
- Crozier D. (1962) The military significance of infectious disease. Mil Med 127:392–6.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Parkman PD, Buescher EL, Artenstein MS. (1962) Recovery of rubella virus from Army recruits. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 111:225–30.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Katz SL, Enders JF, Holloway A. (1962) The development and evaluation of an attenuated measles virus vaccine. Am J Public Health 52:5–10.
[Free Full Text] - Measles—U.S. military. (1981) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 30:314–16.[Medline]
- Craig SC, Broughton G 2nd, Bean J, et al. (1999) Rubella outbreak, Fort Bragg, North Carolina, 1995: a clash of two preventive strategies. Mil Med 164:616–18.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Arday DR, Kanjarpane DD, Kelley PW. (1989) Mumps in the U.S. Army 1980–86: should recruits be immunized? Am J Public Health 79:471–4.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Blouse LE, Lathrop GD, Dupuy HJ, et al. (1982) Rubella screening and vaccination program for U.S. Air Force trainees: an analysis of findings. Am J Public Health 72:280–3.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Kelley PW, Petruccelli BP, Stehr-Green P, et al. (1991) The susceptibility of young adult Americans to vaccine-preventable infections. A national serosurvey of U.S. Army recruits. JAMA 266:2724–9.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Clardy WF. (1993) Susceptibility in USAF recruits to vaccine-preventable diseases. Vaccine 11:573–5.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Struewing JP and Hyams KC. (1993) Tueller Department of Defense, et al. The risk of measles, mumps, and varicella among young adults: a serosurvey of U.S. Navy and Marine Corps recruits. Am J Public Health 83:1717–20.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Smoak BL, Novakoski WL, Mason CJ, et al. (1994) Evidence for a recent decrease in measles susceptibility among young American adults. J Infect Dis 170:216–19.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Burnham BR, Wells TS, Riddle JR. (1998) A cost-benefit analysis of a routine varicella vaccination program for United States Air Force Academy cadets. Mil Med 163:631–4.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Howell MR, Lee T, Gaydos CA, et al. (2000) The cost-effectiveness of varicella screening and vaccination in U.S. Army recruits. Mil Med 165:309–15.[Web of Science][Medline]
- McGuinness AC. (1958) Diphtheria. In Coates JB Jr and Hoff EC (Eds.). Preventive medicine in World War II. Vol . IV. Communicable diseases transmitted chiefly through respiratory & alimentary tracts (Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, Washington, DC) pp. 167–89.
- Liebow AA and Bumstead JH. (1963) Cutaneous and other aspects of diphtheria. In Havens WP Jr (Ed.). Internal medicine in World War II. Vol . II. Infectious diseases (Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, Washington, DC) pp. 275–308 (http://history.amedd.army.mil/booksdocs/wwii/infectiousdisvolii/chapter10.htm).
- Edsall G. (1952) Immunization of adults against diphtheria and tetanus. Am J Public Health 42:393–400.
[Free Full Text] - Edsall G, Altman JS, Gaspar AJ. (1954) Combined tetanus-diphtheria immunization of adults: use of small doses of diphtheria toxoid. Am J Public Health 44:1537–45.
[Free Full Text] - Pierce JR. (2003) "In the interest of humanity and the cause of science": the yellow fever volunteers. Mil Med 168:857–63.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Endy TP, Thomas SJ, Lawler JV. (2005) History of U.S. military contributions to the study of viral hemorrhagic fevers. Mil Med 170:suppl, 77–91.[Medline]
- Reed W, Carroll J, Agramonte A. (1901) The etiology of yellow fever: an additional note. JAMA 36:431–40.
- Pierce JR and Writer JV. (2001) Solving the mystery of yellow fever: the 1900 U.S. Army Yellow Fever Board. Mil Med 166:suppl 1, 1–84.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Reed W. (1902) Recent researches concerning the etiology, propagation, and prevention of yellow fever, by the U.S. Army Commission. J Hyg 2:101–19.
- Reed W, Carroll J, Agramonte A, et al. (2001) The etiology of yellow fever: a preliminary note. Phila Med J 1900;6:790–6. Mil Med 166:suppl 1, 29–36.[Medline]
- Chaves-Carballo E. (2005) Carlos Finlay and yellow fever: triumph over adversity. Mil Med 170:881–5.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Blanck RR. (2002) The history of immunization in the U.S. Armed Forces. Minn Med 85:14–17.[Medline]
- Seeff LB, Beebe GW, Hoofnagle JH, et al. (1987) A serologic follow-up of the 1942 epidemic of post-vaccination hepatitis in the United States Army. N Engl J Med 316:965–70.[Abstract]
- Beebe GW and Hoofnagle JH, et al. Norman Department of Defense. (1993) Mortality follow-up of the 1942 epidemic of hepatitis B in the U.S. Army. Hepatology 18:790–7.[Web of Science]
- Waters TD, Anderson PS Jr, Beebe GW, et al. (1972) Yellow fever vaccination, avian leucosis virus, and cancer risk in man. Science 177:76–7.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Gerasimon G and Lowry K. (2005) Rare case of fatal yellow fever vaccine-associated viscerotropic disease. South Med J 98:653–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Adverse events associated with 17D-derived yellow fever vaccination—United States, 2001–2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (2002) 51:989–93.[Medline]
- Sabin AB. (1947) Epidemic encephalitis in military personnel: isolation of Japanese B virus on Okinawa in 1945, serologic diagnosis, clinical manifestations, epidemiological aspects and use of mouse brain vaccine. JAMA 133:281–93.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Tigertt WD, Hammon WM, Berge TO, et al. (1950) Japanese B encephalitis: a complete review of experience on Okinawa 1945–1949. Am J Trop Med Hyg 30:689–721.[Medline]
- Hoke CH, Nisalak A, Sangawhipa N, et al. (1988) Protection against Japanese encephalitis by inactivated vaccines. N Engl J Med 319:608–14.[Abstract]
- Vaughn DW and Hoke CH Jr. (1992) The epidemiology of Japanese encephalitis: prospects for prevention. Epidemiol Rev 14:197–221.[Web of Science][Medline]
- DeFraites RF, Gambel JM, Hoke CH Jr, et al. (1999) Japanese encephalitis vaccine (inactivated, Biken) in U.S. soldiers: immunogenicity and safety of vaccine administered in two dosing regimens. Am J Trop Med Hyg 61:288–93.[Abstract]
- Hoke CH Jr. (2005) History of U.S. military contributions to the study of viral encephalitis. Mil Med 170:suppl, 92–105.[Medline]
- Human rabies prevention—United States, 1999. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (1999) 48:RR-11–21 Erratum in: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1999;48:16; MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2000;49:737. (www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr4801.pdf).[Medline]
- Halsell JS and Riddle JR. , et al. Atwood Department of Defense. (2003) Myopericarditis following smallpox vaccination among vaccinia-naïve U.S. military personnel. JAMA 289:3283–9.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Arness MK, Eckart RE, Love SS, et al. (2004) Myopericarditis following smallpox vaccination. Am J Epidemiol 160:642–51.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Eckart RE and Love SS. , et al. Atwood Department of Defense. (2004) Incidence and follow-up of inflammatory cardiac complications following smallpox vaccination. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:201–5.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Inglesby TV, O'Toole T, Henderson DA, et al. (2002) Anthrax as a biological weapon, 2002: updated recommendations for management. JAMA 287:2236–52 (jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/287/17/2236.pdf).
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Jernigan DB, Raghunathan PL, Bell BP, et al. (2002) Investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax, United States, 2001: epidemiologic findings. Emerg Infect Dis 8:1019–28 (www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol8no10/pdf/02–0353.pdf).[Web of Science][Medline]
- Wright GG, Green TW, Kanode RG. (1954) Studies on immunity in anthrax. V. Immunizing activity of alum-precipitated protective antigen. J Immunol 73:387–91.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Wright GG, Puziss M, Neely WB. (1962) Studies on immunity in anthrax. IX. Effect of variations in cultural conditions on elaboration of protective antigen by strains of Bacillus anthracis. J Bacteriol 83:515–22.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Puziss M and Wright GG. (1963) Studies on immunity in anthrax. X. Gel-adsorbed protective antigen for immunization of man. J Bacteriol 85:230–6.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Covert NM. (1997) Cutting edge: a history of Fort Detrick, Maryland. 3rd ed (US Army Garrison, Fort Detrick, MD).
- In Joellenbeck LM, Zwanziger L, Durch JS (Eds.), et al. The anthrax vaccine: is it safe? Does it work? (2002) (National Academies Press, Washington, DC) (www.nap.edu/catalog/10310.html).
- Christopher GW, Agan MB, Cieslak TJ, et al. (2005) History of U.S. military contributions to the study of bacterial zoonoses. Mil Med 170:suppl, 39–48.[Medline]
- Brachman PS, Gold H, Plotkin SA, et al. (1962) Field evaluation of human anthrax vaccine. Am J Public Health 52:632–45 (www.anthrax.mil/media/pdf/field_eval.pdf).
[Free Full Text] - Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. (2000) Use of anthrax vaccine in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep 49:RR-151–20 (www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/rr/rr4915.pdf).[Medline]
- Food and Drug Administration. (2005) Biological products; bacterial vaccines and toxoids; implementation of efficacy review; anthrax vaccine adsorbed; final order. Fed Reg 70:75180–98 (www.fda.gov/cber/rules/bvactoxanth.pdf).
- Berezuk GP and McCarty GE. (1992) Investigational drugs and vaccines fielded in support of Operation Desert Storm. Mil Med 157:404–6.[Web of Science][Medline]
- McKee KT Jr, Berezuk GP, Balady MA. (1992) Medicine and war. N Engl J Med 327:1096–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Nightingale SL. (1992) Medicine and war. N Engl J Med 327:1097–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Schuchardt EJ. (1994) Distinguishing between research and medical practice during Operation Desert Storm. Food Drug Law J 49:271–89.
- Rostker B. (2000) Vaccine use during the Gulf War (US Department of Defense, Washington, DC) (www.gulflink.osd.mil/va/). Accessed October 10, 2005.
- Pittman PR, Gibbs PH, Cannon TL, et al. (2001) Anthrax vaccine: short-term safety experience in humans. Vaccine 20:972–8 (www.vaccines.mil/documents/library/Pittman2002Vaccine972.pdf).[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Pittman PR, Mangiafico JA, Rossi CA, et al. (2001) Anthrax vaccine: increasing intervals between the first two doses enhances antibody response in humans. Vaccine 18:213–16 (www.vaccines.mil/documents/library/Vaccine19(2–3)213–6.pdf)).
- Gunzenhauser JD and Parker ME. Cook Department of Defense. (2001) Acute side effects of anthrax vaccine in ROTC cadets participating in advanced camp, Fort Lewis, 2000. Med Surveill Mon Rep 7:9–11 (amsa.army.mil/1MSMR/2001/v07_n05.pdf).
- Pittman PR, Kim-Ahn G, Pifat DY, et al. (2002) Anthrax vaccine: safety and immunogenicity of a dose-reduction, route comparison study in humans. Vaccine 20:1412–20 (www.vaccines.mil/documents/library/Immunogenicity.pdf).[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Rehme PA, Williams R, Grabenstein JD. (2002) Ambulatory medical visits among anthrax vaccinated and unvaccinated personnel after return from southwest Asia. Mil Med 167:205–10 (www.anthrax.mil/documents/library/SWasia.pdf).[Web of Science][Medline]
- Pittman PR, Hack D, Mangiafico J, et al. (2002) Antibody response to a delayed booster dose of anthrax vaccine and botulinum toxoid. Vaccine 20:2107–15 (www.vaccines.mil/documents/library/Antibody_resp.pdf).[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Wasserman GM, Grabenstein JD, Pittman PR, et al. (2003) Analysis of adverse events after anthrax vaccination in U.S. Army medical personnel. J Occup Environ Med 45:222–33 (www.anthrax.mil/documents/library/AnthraxVaccineEvaluation.pdf).[Web of Science][Medline]
- Hoffman K, Costello C, Menich M, et al. (2003) Using a structured medical note for determining the safety profile of anthrax vaccine for U.S. soldiers in Korea. Vaccine 21:4399–409 (www.vaccines.mil/documents/library/Hoffman2003Vaccine4399.pdf).[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Hunter D, Zoutman D, Whitehead J, et al. (2004) Health effects of anthrax vaccination in the Canadian forces. Mil Med 169:833–8 (www.anthrax.mil/documents/library/anthraxvaccinestudy.pdf).[Medline]
- Lange JL, Lesikar SE, Brundage JF, et al. (2003) Comprehensive systematic surveillance for adverse effects of anthrax vaccine adsorbed, U.S. Armed Forces, 1998–2000. Vaccine 21:1620–8 (www.anthrax.mil/documents/library/science.pdf).[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Wells TS, Sato PA, Smith TC, et al. (2006) Military hospitalizations among deployed US service members following anthrax vaccination, 1998–2001. Hum Vaccines 2:54–9.
- Sulsky SI, Grabenstein JD, Delbos RG. (2004) Disability among U.S. Army personnel vaccinated against anthrax. J Occup Environ Med 46:1065–75 (www.anthrax.mil/documents/library/Anthrax2004.pdf).[Web of Science][Medline]
- Wiesen AR and Littell CT. (2002) Relationship between prepregnancy anthrax vaccination and pregnancy and birth outcomes among U.S. Army women. JAMA 287:1556–60 (jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/287/12/1556.pdf).
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Catherino WH, Levi A, Kao TC, et al. (2005) The anthrax vaccine does not affect semen parameters, embryo quality, or pregnancy outcome in couples with a vaccinated male military service member. Fertil Steril 83:480–3 (www.vaccines.mil/documents/library/Catherino_Anthrax_Vaccine_2005.pdf).[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Status of U.S. Department of Defense preliminary evaluation of the association of anthrax vaccination and congenital anomalies. (2002) MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 51:127 (www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/wk/mm5106.pdf).
- Sever JL, Brenner AI, Gale AD, et al. (2002) Safety of anthrax vaccine: a review by the Anthrax Vaccine Expert Committee (AVEC) of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 11:189–202 (www.anthrax.mil/media/pdf/AVEC_ms.pdf).[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Sever JL, Brenner AI, Gale AD, et al. (2004) Safety of anthrax vaccine: an expanded review and evaluation of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 13:825–40 (www.anthrax.mil/media/pdf/SeverArticle.pdf).[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Pittman PR, Coonan KM, Gibbs PH, et al. (2004) Long-term health effects of repeated exposure to multiple vaccines. Vaccine 23:525–36 (www.vaccines.mil/documents/library/Longtermhealtheffects.pdf).[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Matyas GR, Rao M, Pittman PR, et al. (2004) Detection of antibodies to squalene. III. Naturally occurring antibodies to squalene in humans and mice. J Immunol Methods 286:47–67.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Meyer KF, Cavanaugh DC, Bartelloni PJ, et al. (1974) Plague immunization. I. Past and present trends. J Infect Dis 129:supplS13–18.[Medline]
- Marshall JD Jr, Bartelloni PJ, Cavanaugh DC, et al. (1974) Plague immunization. II. Relation of adverse clinical reactions to multiple immunizations with killed vaccine. J Infect Dis 129:supplS19–25.[Medline]
- Cavanaugh DC and Cadigan FC Jr, et al. Williams Department of Defense. (1982) Plague. In Ognibene AJ and Barrett O Jr (Eds.). Internal medicine in Vietnam. Vol . II. General medicine and infectious diseases (US Army, Washington, DC) pp. 167–97.
- Titball RW and Williamson ED. (2001) Vaccination against bubonic and pneumonic plague. Vaccine 19:4175–84.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Titball RW and Williamson ED. (2004) Yersinia pestis (plague) vaccines. Expert Opin Biol Ther 4:965–73.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Prevention of plague: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). (1996) MMWR Recomm Rep 45:RR-141–15 (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00044836.htm).[Medline]
- Inglesby TV, Dennis DT, Henderson DA, et al. (2000) Plague as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA 283:2281–90 (jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/283/17/2281.pdf).
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Russell P, Eley SM, Hibbs SE, et al. (1995) A comparison of plague vaccine, USP and EV76 vaccine induced protection against Yersinia pestis in a murine model. Vaccine 13:1551–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Heath DG, Anderson GW Jr, Mauro JM, et al. (1998) Protection against experimental bubonic and pneumonic plague by a recombinant capsular F1-V antigen fusion protein vaccine. Vaccine 16:1131–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Cecil RL and Austin JH. (1918) Results of prophylactic inoculation against pneumococcus in 12,519 men. J Exp Med 28:19–41.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Cecil RL and Vaughan HF. (1919) Results of prophylactic vaccination against pneumonia at Camp Wheeler. J Exp Med 29:457–83.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - MacLeod CM, Hodges RG, Heidelberger M, et al. (1945) Prevention of pneumococcal pneumonia by immunization with specific capsular polysaccharides. J Exp Med 81:445–65.
- English PC. (1987) Therapeutic strategies to combat pneumococcal disease: repeated failure of physicians to adopt pneumococcal vaccine, 1900–1945. Perspect Biol Med 30:170–85.[Web of Science][Medline]
- McKeehan JA, Ryan MA, Gray GC. (2001) Pneumococcal vaccine to counter emerging infectious disease threat in the military. Mil Med 166:1087–90.[Medline]
- Russell KL. Efficacy of the 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine in healthy military recruits. Presented at the 4th International Symposium on Pneumococci and Pneumococcal Diseases, Helsinki, Finland, May 9–13, 2004.
- Prevots DR, Burr RK, Sutter RW, et al. (2000) Poliomyelitis prevention in the United States. Updated recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 49:RR-51–22 (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr4905a1.htm).[Medline]
- Peeler RN, Cluff LE, Trever RW. (1958) Hyper-immunization of man. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 103:183–98.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Haycraft RG. (1962) Studies on hyperimmunization in man. Mil Med 127:745–52.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Peeler RN, Kadull PJ, Cluff LE. (1965) Intensive immunization of man: evaluation of possible adverse consequences. Ann Intern Med 63:44–57 (www.anthrax.mil/media/pdf/Intensive.pdf).
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - White CS 3rd, Adler WH, McGann VG. (1974) Repeated immunization: possible adverse effects. Reevaluation of human subjects at 25 years. Ann Intern Med 81:594–600 (http://www.anthrax.mil/documents/library/Repeated.pdf).
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Rusnak JM, Kortepeter MG, Aldis J, et al. (2004) Experience in the medical management of potential laboratory exposures to agents of bioterrorism on the basis of risk assessment at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). J Occup Environ Med 46:801–11.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Pittman PR, Norris SL, Coonan KM, et al. (2005) An assessment of health status among medical research volunteers who served in the Project Whitecoat program at Fort Detrick, Maryland. Mil Med 170:183–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Sadusk JF Jr. (1947) Typhus fever in the United States Army following immunization: incidence, severity of the disease, modification of the clinical course and serologic diagnosis. JAMA 133:1192–9.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bayne-Jones S. (1950) Commentary on typhus control in World War II. Yale J Biol Med 22:483–93.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Bayne-Jones S. (1964) Typhus fevers. In: Preventive medicine in World War II. Vol . VII. Communicable diseases (Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, Washington, DC).
- Bavaro MF, Kelly DJ, Dasch GA, et al. (2005) History of U.S. military contributions to the study of rickettsial diseases. Mil Med 170:suppl49–60.[Medline]
- McNeil JG, Lednar WM, Stansfield SK, et al. (1985) Central European tick-borne encephalitis: assessment of risk for persons in the Armed Forces and vacationers. J Infect Dis 152:650–1.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Craig SC, Pittman PR, Lewis TE, et al. (1999) An accelerated schedule for tick-borne encephalitis vaccine: the American military experience in Bosnia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 61:874–8.[Abstract]
- Bruton OC. (1952) Agammaglobulinemia. Pediatrics 9:722–8.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Bruton OC. (1962) A decade with agammaglobulinemia. J Pediatr 60:672–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Buckley CR. (1998) Agammaglobulinemia, by Col. Ogden C. Bruton, MC, USA, Pediatrics 1952;9:722–728. Pediatrics 102:213–15.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Prince GA, Hemming VG, Horswood RL, et al. (1985) Immunoprophylaxis and immunotherapy of respiratory syncytial virus infection in the cotton rat. Virus Res 3:193–206.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Hemming VG, Prince GA, Rodriguez W, et al. (1988) Respiratory syncytial virus infections and intravenous gamma-globulins. Pediatr Infect Dis J 7:supplS103–6.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Kelso JM, Jones RT, Yunginger JW. (1993) Anaphylaxis to measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine mediated by IgE to gelatin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 91:867–72.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Agerty HA. (1947) An outbreak of smallpox in American military personnel in Japan. N Engl J Med 237:305–9.
- Postema AS, Breiman RF, National Vaccine Advisory Committee. Adult immunization programs in nontraditional settings: quality standards and guidance for program evaluation. MMWR Recomm Rep 2000;49(RR-1):1–13. (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr4901a1.htm).
- Armed Forces Epidemiological Board. (2004) Multiple concurrent immunizations and safety concerns. (Armed Forces Epidemiological Board, Falls Church, VA) (Recommendation 2004-04) (www.vaccines.mil/documents/477AFEB2004.pdf).
- Institute of Medicine. (2002) Immunization safety review: multiple immunizations and immune dysfunction. (National Academies Press, Washington, DC) (www.nap.edu/catalog/10306.html).
- Offit PA, Quarles J, Gerber MA, et al. (2002) Addressing parents' concerns: do multiple vaccines overwhelm or weaken the infant's immune system? Pediatrics 109:124–9.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Paul JR. (1965) A nationwide serum survey of U.S. recruits; the three Armed Services. Mil Med 130:1–12.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Jacobs RJ, Saab S, Meyerhoff AS, et al. (2003) An economic assessment of pre-vaccination screening for hepatitis A and B. Public Health Rep 118:550–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Scott PT, Niebuhr DW, McGready JB, et al. (2005) Hepatitis B immunity in United States military recruits. J Infect Dis 191:1835–41.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Pablo K, Rooks P, Nevin R. (2005) Benefits of serologic screening for hepatitis B immunity in military recruits. J Infect Dis 191:2180–1.[CrossRef]
- Warren J, Ziherl FA, Kish AW, et al. (1953) Large-scale administration of vaccines by means of an automatic jet injection syringe. JAMA 157:633–7.
- Benenson AS. (1959) Mass immunization by jet injection. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium of Immunology, Opatija, Yugoslavia pp. 393–9.
- Hingson RA, Davis HS, Rosen M. (1963) The historical development of jet injection and envisioned uses in mass immunization and mass therapy based upon two decades' experience. Mil Med 128:516–24.
- Hingson RA, Davis HS, Rosen M. (1963) Clinical experience with one and a half million jet injections in parenteral therapy and in preventive medicine. Mil Med 128:525–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Foege WH and Eddins DL. (1973) Mass vaccination programs in developing countries. Prog Med Virol 15:205–43.[Medline]
- Hepatitis B associated with jet gun injection—California. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (1986) 35:373–6.[Medline]
- Canter J, Mackey K, Good LS, et al. (1990) An outbreak of hepatitis B associated with jet injections in a weight reduction clinic. Arch Intern Med 150:1923–7.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Borio L, Inglesby T, Peters CJ, et al. (2002) Hemorrhagic fever viruses as biological weapons: medical and public health management. JAMA 287:2391–405 (jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/287/18/2391.pdf).
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Maiztegui JI, McKee KT Jr, Barrera Oro JG, et al. (1998) Protective efficacy of a live attenuated vaccine against Argentine hemorrhagic fever. J Infect Dis 177:277–83.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Byrne MP and Smith LA. (2000) Development of vaccines for prevention of botulism. Biochimie 82:955–66.[Medline]
- Levitt NH, Ramsburg HH, Hasty SE, et al. (1986) Development of an attenuated strain of chikungunya virus for use in vaccine production. Vaccine 4:157–62.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Edelman R, Tacket CO, Wasserman SS, et al. (2000) Phase II safety and immunogenicity study of live chikungunya virus vaccine TSI-GSD-218. Am J Trop Med Hyg 62:681–5.[Abstract]
- Innis BL and Eckels KH. (2003) Progress in development of a live-attenuated, tetravalent dengue virus vaccine by the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command. Am J Trop Med Hyg 69:suppl, 1–4 erratum in: Am J Trop Med Hyg 2004;70:336.
[Free Full Text] - Bartelloni PJ, McKinney RW, Duffy TP, et al. (1970) An inactivated eastern equine encephalomyelitis vaccine propagated in chick-embryo cell culture. II. Clinical and serologic responses in man. Am J Trop Med Hyg 19:123–6.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pushko P, Geisbert J, Parker M, et al. (2001) Individual and bivalent vaccines based on alphavirus replicons protect guinea pigs against infection with Lassa and Ebola viruses. J Virol 75:11677–85.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Jones SM, Feldmann H, Stroher U, et al. (2005) Live attenuated recombinant vaccine protects nonhuman primates against Ebola and Marburg viruses. Nat Med 11:786–90.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Katz DE, DeLorimier AJ, Wolf MK, et al. (2003) Oral immunization of adult volunteers with microencapsulated enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) CS6 antigen. Vaccine 21:341–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Emerson SU and Purcell RH. (2003) Hepatitis E virus. Rev Med Virol 13:145–54.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Birx DL, Loomis-Price LD, Aronson N, et al. (2000) Efficacy testing of recombinant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) gp160 as a therapeutic vaccine in early-stage HIV-1-infected volunteers. J Infect Dis 181:881–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Nitayaphan S, Khamboonruang C, Sirisophana N, et al. (2000) A phase I/II trial of HIV SF2 gp120/MF59 vaccine in seronegative Thais. Vaccine 18:1448–55.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Brown AE and Nitayaphan S. (2004) Foundations for a phase III human immunodeficiency virus vaccine trial: a decade of Thai-U.S. Army collaborative research. Mil Med 169:588–93.[Medline]
- Rasnake MS, Conger NG, McAllister K, et al. (2005) History of U.S. military contributions to the study of sexually transmitted diseases. Mil Med 170:suppl, 61–5.[Medline]
- Hockmeyer WT and Ballou WR. (1988) Sporozoite immunity and vaccine development. Prog Allergy 41:1–14.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Alonso PL, Sacarlal J, Aponte JJ, et al. (2004) Efficacy of the RTS,S/AS02A vaccine against Plasmodium falciparum infection and disease in young African children: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364:1411–20.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Heppner DG Jr, Kester KE, Ockenhouse CF, et al. (2005) Towards an RTS,S-based, multi-stage, multi-antigen vaccine against falciparum malaria: progress at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Vaccine 23:2243–50.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Ockenhouse CF, Magill A, Smith D, et al. (2005) History of U.S. military contributions to the study of malaria. Mil Med 170:suppl, 12–16.[Medline]
- Mogabgab WJ. (1968) Protective effects of inactive Mycoplasma pneumoniae vaccine in military personnel, 1964–1966. Am Rev Resp Dis 97:359–65.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Boslego J, Garcia J, Cruz C, et al. (1995) Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of a meningococcal group B (15:P1.3) outer membrane protein vaccine in Iquique, Chile. Vaccine 13:821–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Katial RK, Brandt BL, Moran EE, et al. (2002) Immunogenicity and safety testing of a group B intranasal meningococcal native outer membrane vesicle vaccine. Infect Immun 70:702–7.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Vivona S, Lowenthal JP, Berman S, et al. (1964) Report of a field study with Q fever vaccine. Am J Hyg 79:143–53.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Waag DM, England MJ, Tammariello RF, et al. (2002) Comparative efficacy and immunogenicity of Q fever chloroform:methanol residue (CMR) and phase I cellular (Q-Vax) vaccines in cynomolgus monkeys challenged by aerosol. Vaccine 20:2623–34.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Randall R, Gibbs CJ Jr, Aulisio CG, et al. (1962) The development of a formalin-killed Rift Valley fever virus vaccine for use in man. J Immunol 89:660–71.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Randall R, Binn LN, Harrison VR. (1964) Immunization against Rift Valley fever virus, studies on the immunogenicity of lyophilized formalin-inactivated vaccine. J Immunol 93:293–9.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Niklasson B. (1982) Rift Valley fever virus vaccine trial: study of side-effects in humans. Scand J Infect Dis 14:105–9.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Niklasson B, Peters CJ, Bengtsson E, et al. (1985) Rift Valley fever virus vaccine trial: study of neutralizing antibody response in humans. Vaccine 3:123–7.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Pittman PR, Liu CT, Cannon TL, et al. (1999) Immunogenicity of an inactivated Rift Valley fever vaccine in humans: a 12-year experience. Vaccine 18:181–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Katz DE, Coster TS, Wolf MK, et al. (2004) Two studies evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of a live, attenuated Shigella flexneri 2a vaccine (SC602) and excretion of vaccine organisms in North American volunteers. Infect Immun 72:923–30.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Drabick JJ, Narayanan RB, Williams JC, et al. (1994) Passive protection of mice against lethal Francisella tularensis (live tularemia vaccine strain) infection by the sera of human recipients of the live tularemia vaccine. Am J Med Sci 308:83–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Waag DM, McKee KT Jr, Sandstrom G, et al. (1995) Cell-mediated and humoral immune responses after vaccination of human volunteers with the live vaccine strain of Francisella tularensis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2:143–8.[Medline]
- Waag DM, Sandstrom G, England MJ, et al. (1996) Immunogenicity of a new lot of Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain in human volunteers. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 13:205–9.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Dennis DT, Inglesby TV, Henderson DA, et al. (2001) Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. JAMA 285:2763–73 (jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/285/21/2763.pdf).
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Alevizatos AC, McKinney RW, Feigin RD. (1967) Live, attenuated Venezuelan equine encephalomyelitis virus vaccine. I. Clinical effects in man. Am J Trop Med Hyg 16:762–8.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pedersen CE Jr. (1976) Preparation and testing of vaccines prepared from the envelopes of Venezuelan, eastern, and western equine encephalomyelitis viruses. J Clin Microbiol 3:113–18.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Pratt WD, Davis NL, Johnston RE, et al. (2003) Genetically engineered, live attenuated vaccines for Venezuelan equine encephalitis: testing in animal models. Vaccine 21:3854–62.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Bartelloni PJ, McKinney RW, Calia FM, et al. (1971) Inactivated western equine encephalomyelitis vaccine propagated in chick embryo cell culture: clinical and serological evaluation in man. Am J Trop Med Hyg 20:146–9.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Boslego JW, Tramont EC, Chung RC, et al. (1991) Efficacy trial of a parenteral gonococcal pilus vaccine in men. Vaccine 9:154–62.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Reed DS, Lind CM, Lackemeyer MG, et al. (2005) Genetically engineered, live, attenuated vaccines protect nonhuman primates against aerosol challenge with a virulent IE strain of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. Vaccine 23:3139–47.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Klinman DM, Xie H, Little SF, et al. (2004) CpG oligonucleotides improve the protective immune response induced by the anthrax vaccination of rhesus macaques. Vaccine 22:2881–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Klinman DM, Currie D, Gursel I, et al. (2004) Use of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides as immune adjuvants. Immunol Rev 199:201–16.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Xie H, Gursel I, Ivins BE, et al. (2005) CpG oligodeoxynucleotides adsorbed onto polylactide-co-glycolide microparticles improve the immunogenicity and protective activity of the licensed anthrax vaccine. Infect Immun 73:828–33.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Boles JW, Pitt ML, LeClaire RD, et al. (2003) Correlation of body temperature with protection against staphylococcal enterotoxin B exposure and use in determining vaccine dose-schedule. Vaccine 21:2791–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Schmaljohn CS, Hasty SE, Dalrymple JM. (1992) Preparation of candidate vaccinia-vectored vaccines for haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Vaccine 10:10–13.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- McClain DJ, Summers PL, Harrison SA, et al. (2000) Clinical evaluation of a vaccinia-vectored Hantaan virus vaccine. J Med Virol 60:77–85.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Schoepp RJ, Smith JF, Parker MD. (2002) Recombinant chimeric western and eastern equine encephalitis viruses as potential vaccine candidates. Virology 302:299–309.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Hevey M, Negley D, Pushko P, et al. (1998) Marburg virus vaccines based upon alphavirus replicons protect guinea pigs and nonhuman primates. Virology 251:28–37.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Hevey M, Negley D, VanderZanden L, et al. (2001) Marburg virus vaccines: comparing classical and new approaches. Vaccine 20:586–93.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Custer DM, Thompson E, Schmaljohn CS, et al. (2003) Active and passive vaccination against hantavirus pulmonary syndrome with Andes virus M genome segment-based DNA vaccine. J Virol 77:9894–905.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Meegan JM. (1979) The Rift Valley fever epizootic in Egypt 1977–1978. I. Description of the epizootic and virological studies. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 73:618–23.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Rift Valley fever—East Africa, 1997–1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep (1998) 47:261–4.[Medline]
- Kenyon RH, Sammons LS, Pedersen CE Jr. (1975) Comparison of three Rocky Mountain spotted fever vaccines. J Clin Microbiol 2:300–4.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Clements ML, Wisseman CL Jr, Woodward TE, et al. (1983) Reactogenicity, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a chick embryo cell-derived vaccine for Rocky Mountain spotted fever. J Infect Dis 148:922–30.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Alving CR. (2002) Design and selection of vaccine adjuvants: animal models and human trials. Vaccine 20:suppl 3, S56–64.[Medline]
- McClain JB, Edelman R, Shmuklarsky M, et al. (2001) Unusual persistence in healthy volunteers and ill patients of hyperimmune immunoglobulin directed against multiple Pseudomonas O-chain and Klebsiella serotypes after intravenous infusion. Vaccine 19:3499–508.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
- Maruyama T, Rodriguez LL, Jahrling PB, et al. (1999) Ebola virus can be effectively neutralized by antibody produced in natural human infection. J Virol 73:6024–30.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Eddy GA, Wagner FS, Scott SK, et al. (1975) Protection of monkeys against Machupo virus by the passive administration of Bolivian haemorrhagic fever immunoglobulin (human origin). Bull World Health Organ 52:723–7.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Hibbs RG, Weber JT, Corwin A, et al. (1996) Experience with the use of an investigational F(ab')2 heptavalent botulism immune globulin of equine origin during an outbreak of type E botulism in Egypt. Clin Infect Dis 23:337–40.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Pittman PR, Leitman SF, Oro JG, et al. (2005) Protective antigen and toxin neutralization antibody patterns in anthrax vaccinees undergoing serial plasmapheresis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12:713–21.[CrossRef][Medline]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Z. Wang, S. Tobler, J. Roayaei, and A. Eick Live Attenuated or Inactivated Influenza Vaccines and Medical Encounters for Respiratory Illnesses Among US Military Personnel JAMA, March 4, 2009; 301(9): 945 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Ibrahim Editorial: Vaccines and Public Health Epidemiol. Rev., August 1, 2006; 28(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. R. Hinman, W. A. Orenstein, and L. E. Rodewald Vaccines--Victories and Challenges Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2006; 164(3): 197 - 199. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||